Penegakan Hukum Oleh Penyidik Satuan Reserse Kepolisian Resor Lahat terhadap Tindak Pidana Persetubuhan dan Perbuatan Cabul terhadap Anak Di Kabupaten Lahat
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v4i3.3303Keywords:
Law Enforcement, Investigation, Evidence, Sexual Intercourse, Obscene Acts, ChildrenAbstract
This study aims to analyze law enforcement carried out by investigators of the Women and Children Protection Unit (PPA) of the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Lahat Resort Police in handling criminal acts of sexual intercourse and obscene acts against children, as well as to analyze the implementation of evidence and the factors that hinder the handling of such cases. This research employs an empirical legal research method with a normative approach and uses a descriptive-analytical design. Data were obtained through field research and literature study and were analyzed qualitatively. The results of the study indicate that law enforcement by investigators of the PPA Unit of the Criminal Investigation Unit of the Lahat Resort Police has, in principle, been carried out in accordance with applicable legal provisions through the stages of receiving reports, investigation, examination of victims and witnesses, collection of evidence, medical and psychological examinations, and preparation of case files. The evidentiary process is conducted by combining statements from victims and witnesses, expert testimony, documents, indications, physical evidence, Visum et Repertum, and electronic evidence according to the characteristics of each case. However, the implementation of law enforcement has not been fully optimal due to several obstacles, including the psychological condition of victims, limited witnesses and evidence, difficulties in locating suspects, limited availability of electronic evidence, geographical factors, and limitations in human resources and supporting facilities. Therefore, it is necessary to improve investigators' competencies, provide child-friendly examination facilities, optimize the use of technology and scientific evidence, and strengthen inter-agency coordination in order to achieve effective law enforcement and optimal child protection.
References
Andi Hamzah. (2016). Hukum acara pidana Indonesia. Sinar Grafika.
Barda Nawawi Arief. (2011). Bunga rampai kebijakan hukum pidana. Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Indonesia. (1945). Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945.
Indonesia. (1981). Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Pidana.
Indonesia. (2002). Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2002 tentang Kepolisian Negara Republik Indonesia.
Indonesia. (2014a). Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2006 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban.
Indonesia. (2014b). Undang-Undang Nomor 35 Tahun 2014 tentang Perubahan atas Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2002 tentang Perlindungan Anak.
Indonesia. (2022). Undang-Undang Nomor 12 Tahun 2022 tentang Tindak Pidana Kekerasan Seksual.
M. Yahya Harahap. (2021). Pembahasan permasalahan dan penerapan KUHAP: Penyidikan dan penuntutan. Sinar Grafika.
Maidin Gultom. (2014). Perlindungan hukum terhadap anak dalam sistem peradilan pidana anak di Indonesia. PT Refika Aditama.
Marlina. (2009). Peradilan pidana anak di Indonesia: Pengembangan konsep diversi dan restorative justice. Refika Aditama.
Mardjono Reksodiputro. (1994). Sistem peradilan pidana Indonesia: Melihat kepada kejahatan dan penegakan hukum dalam batas-batas toleransi. Pusat Pelayanan Keadilan dan Pengabdian Hukum Universitas Indonesia.
Muladi. (1995). Kapita selekta sistem peradilan pidana. Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Rika Saraswati. (2020). Hukum perlindungan anak di Indonesia. Citra Aditya Bakti.
Soerjono Soekanto. (2014). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi penegakan hukum. Rajawali Pers.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
