Kinerja Reformasi Birokrasi pada Kantor Wilayah Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan Sumatera Selatan Tahun 2025

Authors

  • Nathasya Ayu Syaharani Universitas Indo Global Mandiri
  • Doris Febriyanti Universitas Indo Global Mandiri
  • Dwiki Adi Putra Universitas Indo Global Mandiri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v4i3.3310

Keywords:

Accountability, Bureaucratic Performance, Bureaucratic Reform, Responsiveness, Service Quality

Abstract

This research aims to examine bureaucratic reform performance at the South Sumatra Regional Office of the Directorate General of Corrections. This study employs a qualitative method with a descriptive approach. Data were collected through observation, interviews, documentation, and literature study, and analyzed using Agus Dwiyanto’s (2008) bureaucratic performance theory, which covers productivity, service quality, responsiveness, responsibility, and accountability. The findings indicate that governance and bureaucratic reform have generally been implemented well. This is reflected in the achievement of performance targets, the provision of good quality services, the organization’s ability to respond to needs, personnel compliance with regulations and standard operating procedures, and the implementation of accountability and supervision in accordance with applicable regulations. Nevertheless, several challenges remain, including limited human resources, insufficient budgets for monitoring and evaluation activities, and a performance reporting system that has not been optimally integrated. Therefore, strengthening human resource capacity, integrating information systems, and improving coordination are necessary to support more effective, transparent, responsive, and accountable bureaucratic reform in the future. These efforts are expected to improve organizational performance and strengthen public service governance over time.

References

Agung, P. G., Alfikri, R. S., Fajri, M. A., & Ganefi. (2025). Analisis yuridis terhadap pelaksanaan fungsi pembinaan dan pengamanan oleh Kantor Wilayah Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan Bengkulu. Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, 2(1), 280–284.

Andri, M. J., & Ilosa, A. (2022). Analisis reformasi birokrasi melalui zona integritas pada Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Kelas II A Pekanbaru. Jurnal Ekonomi dan Ilmu Sosial (JEIS), 2(1), 59–67.

Direktur Jenderal Pemasyarakatan Kementerian Imigrasi dan Pemasyarakatan Republik Indonesia. (2025). Keputusan Direktur Jenderal Pemasyarakatan Kementerian Imigrasi dan Pemasyarakatan Republik Indonesia Nomor PAS-02.OT.02.02 Tahun 2025.

Febriyanti, D., Widianingsih, I., Sumaryana, A., & Buchari, R. A. (2023). Information communication technology (ICT) on Palembang city government, Indonesia: Performance measurement for great digital governance. Cogent Social Sciences, 9(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2269710

Hamja. (2022). Implikasi overcrowding terhadap lembaga pemasyarakatan di Indonesia. Mimbar Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada, 34, 296–324. https://doi.org/10.22146/mh.v34i1.2495

Hidayat, F. (2023). The impact of bureaucratic reform on Indonesian governance: A perspective review of academic literature. Jurnal Politik Pemerintahan Dharma Praja, 6(2), 169–196. https://doi.org/10.33701/jppdp.v16i2.3761

KemenPAN-RB. (2023). Paparan jelang pemantauan dan evaluasi SPBE 2022. Kementerian Pendayagunaan Aparatur Negara dan Reformasi Birokrasi Republik Indonesia.

Nurhidayat, I. (2023). Prinsip-prinsip good governance di Indonesia. E-Gov Wiyata: Education and Government, 1(1), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.71128/e-gov.v1i1.5

Oscar Radyan Danar, S. A. P. M. A. P. (2022). Teori governance. Deepublish. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=Q8X3EAAAQBAJ

Peraturan Menteri Imigrasi dan Pemasyarakatan Nomor 1 Tahun 2024 tentang Organisasi dan Tata Kerja Kementerian Imigrasi dan Pemasyarakatan. (2024).

Peraturan Presiden Nomor 139 Tahun 2024 tentang Penataan Tugas dan Fungsi Kementerian Negara Kabinet Merah Putih Periode Tahun 2024–2029. (2024).

Peraturan Presiden Nomor 157 Tahun 2024 tentang Kementerian Imigrasi dan Pemasyarakatan. (2024).

Pungky, M., Wijaya, H., & Ali, M. Z. (2021). Legislation impediments in reorganising government bodies in Indonesia. Bestuur, 9(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.20961/bestuur.v9i1.51633

Ramadan. (2025). Implementation of good governance principles in improving the quality of public services. Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains, 8(12), 7492–7498. https://doi.org/10.56338/jks.v8i12.9176

Saputra, S. N. E., & Isnawati, M. (2022). Overcrowding lembaga pemasyarakatan (Lapas) dalam system pemidanaan di Indonesia. Pagaruyuang Law Journal, 6(1), 52–70. https://doi.org/10.31869/plj.v0i0.3822

Setyasih, E. T. (2023). Reformasi birokrasi dan tantangan implementasi good governance di Indonesia. JURNAL KELOLA: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, 6(1), 48–62.

U4 BRIEF. (2025). Integrity zones in Indonesian prisons: Addressing corruption amid overcrowding.

Wahyudi, H. (2025). Dasar-dasar teori administrasi negara: Perspektif global dan lokal. Jaka Maulana. https://books.google.co.id/books?id=FrKZEQAAQBAJ

Wahyurudhanto, A. (2020). Critical reorientation of bureaucratic reform and good governance in public sector administration in Indonesia. Webology, 17(2), 308–316. https://doi.org/10.14704/WEB/V17I2/WEB17033

Downloads

Published

2026-09-07

How to Cite

Nathasya Ayu Syaharani, Doris Febriyanti, & Dwiki Adi Putra. (2026). Kinerja Reformasi Birokrasi pada Kantor Wilayah Direktorat Jenderal Pemasyarakatan Sumatera Selatan Tahun 2025. Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 4(3), 154–169. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v4i3.3310