Analisis Yuridis Yurisdiksi International Criminal Court (ICC) terhadap Kejahatan Internasional Berdasarkan Statuta Roma

(Studi Kasus Israel-Palestina)

Authors

  • Ahmad Bahrul Ulum Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang
  • Deny Guntara Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang
  • Muhamad Abas Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang
  • Raka Indra Pratama Universitas Buana Perjuangan Karawang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v4i2.3334

Keywords:

International Crimes, International Criminal Court (ICC), International Jurisdiction, Israel-Palestine, Rome Statute of 1998

Abstract

The jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC) under the 1998 Rome Statute faces challenges when international crimes involve non-States Parties, as evidenced by the Israel-Palestine case. While Palestine has been a State Party since 2015, Israel rejects the ICC's jurisdiction because it is not a State Party. This study aims to analyze the provisions regarding international crimes and ICC jurisdiction under the Rome Statute, as well as their application to the Israel-Palestine case. Employing a normative legal method with statutory and case-based approaches, the research analyzes the Rome Statute, the UN Charter, the 1949 Geneva Conventions, UN General Assembly Resolution 67/19 (2012), and the ICC ruling on the "Situation in the State of Palestine." The findings indicate that ICC jurisdiction over nationals of non-States Parties can be exercised through the principle of delegated territorial jurisdiction, pursuant to Article 12(2)(a) of the Rome Statute. However, the effective enforcement of this jurisdiction remains hindered by Israel's lack of cooperation and by international political pressure. Consequently, the ICC's primary challenge lies in strengthening its institutional legitimacy and enforcement capacity in upholding international criminal law.

References

Al Jazeera. (2025). ICC rejects Israeli bid to block Gaza war crimes investigation. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2025/12/15/icc-rejects-israeli-bid-to-block-gaza-war-crimes-investigation

Angelina Nadia Putri, Lestarika, D. P., & Sary, W. E. (2025). Eksistensi prinsip complementarity dalam yurisdiksi Mahkamah Pidana Internasional. Jurnal Dimensi Hukum, 9(4).

Atmasasmita, R. (2000). Pengantar hukum pidana internasional. Refika Aditama.

Bracka, J. (2021). A false messiah? The ICC in Israel/Palestine and the limits of international criminal justice. Vanderbilt Journal of Transnational Law, 54(2).

Christianti, D. W. (2015). Yurisdiksi International Criminal Court (ICC) terhadap warga negara non-pihak Statuta Roma dan dampaknya bagi Indonesia. Padjadjaran Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 2(1).

Courthouse News Service. (2025). ICC rejects Israel bid to stall Palestine probe. https://www.courthousenews.com/icc-rejects-israel-bid-to-stall-palestine-probe/

Guntara, D., & Abas, M. (2025). Legal analysis of financial sector supervision and regulation for consumer protection in financial services. Jurnal Pembaharuan Hukum, 12(1).

Hiariej, E. O. S. (2009). Pengantar hukum pidana internasional. Erlangga.

International Criminal Court. (2021). ICC Pre-Trial Chamber I issues its decision on the Prosecutor’s request related to territorial jurisdiction over Palestine. https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/icc-pre-trial-chamber-i-issues-its-decision-prosecutors-request-related-territorial

International Criminal Court. (2025). Situation in the State of Palestine: Appeals Chamber reverses the Pre-Trial Chamber's decision on Israel's challenge to the jurisdiction of the Court. https://www.icc-cpi.int/news/situation-state-palestine-appeals-chamber-reverses-pre-trial-chambers-decision-israels

Marzuki, P. M. (2011). Penelitian hukum. Kencana.

Middle East Eye. (2025). US sanctions two ICC judges for rejecting Israel's appeal against Gaza investigation. https://www.middleeasteye.net/news/us-sanctions-two-icc-judges-rejecting-israels-bid-invalidate-netanyahus-warrant

Muladi. (2005). Hak asasi manusia: Hakikat, konsep dan implikasinya dalam perspektif hukum dan masyarakat. Refika Aditama.

Nadia Pratiwi. (2024). Pelanggaran prinsip-prinsip hukum humaniter internasional dalam agresi militer Israel ke Palestina. Jurnal Hukum Indonesia, 3(2).

National Law Review. (2025). Trump's executive order and sanctions on ICC explained. https://natlawreview.com/article/president-trump-imposes-sanctions-international-criminal-court

Ninda Soraya, Muhammad, A., & Ladiqi, S. (2024). ICC jurisdiction: Against Israeli war and humanitarian crimes targeting Palestinian civilians 2023. Jurnal Media Hukum, 31(1).

Office of Foreign Assets Control. (2025). Issuance of executive order imposing sanctions on the International Criminal Court. https://ofac.treasury.gov/recent-actions/20250213

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. (1998). Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court.

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. (2010). The Kampala amendments to the Rome Statute on the crime of aggression.

Sefriani. (2009). Yurisdiksi ICC terhadap negara non anggota Statuta Roma 1998. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 14(2).

Situngkir, D. A. (2018). Pertanggungjawaban pidana individu dalam hukum pidana internasional. Jurnal Litigasi, 19(1).

Situngkir, D. A. (2018). Urgensi ratifikasi Statuta Roma bagi Indonesia. UIR Law Review, 2(2).

Soekanto, S. (2012). Pengantar penelitian hukum. UI Press.

Downloads

Published

2026-06-30

How to Cite

Ahmad Bahrul Ulum, Deny Guntara, Muhamad Abas, & Raka Indra Pratama. (2026). Analisis Yuridis Yurisdiksi International Criminal Court (ICC) terhadap Kejahatan Internasional Berdasarkan Statuta Roma: (Studi Kasus Israel-Palestina). Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 4(2), 369–381. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v4i2.3334

Similar Articles

<< < 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.