Studi Kasus Gugatan dalam Rekonvensi tentang Pengangkatan Sita Jaminan pada Perkara Perlawanan dalam Putusan Nomor 452/Pdt.G/2023/PA JT

Authors

  • Fauziyah Rahmah Izzati Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Linda Rachmainy Universitas Padjadjaran
  • Sherly Ayuna Putri Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i3.1365

Keywords:

Reconvention, Opposition, Collateral Confiscation

Abstract

Reconvention can be filed in all cases except those which regulated in Article 132a HIR. HIR does not regulate material requirements regarding the substantial connection between convention and reconvention claim. Judicial practice tends to do so, as stated in Court Decision Number 452/Pdt.G/2023/PA JT. The Judges determined to reject the reconvention claim based on the consideration that the reconvention’s claim was closely related to the convention one, so the claim in the reconvention was rejected as the convention’s claim decided to be rejected. This research aims to determine the basis of the reconvention claim regarding the removal of collateral confiscation based on the Civil Procedure Law and determine the legal consequence of the court decision which rejected the reconvention claim regarding the collateral confiscation of dispute object. The results showed that the reconvention claim which requested the implementation of the confiscation of collateral is closely related to the convention one. The reconvention filed basically has fulfilled the regulations in Article 132a and Article 132b HIR. The decision to reject this claim was based on the fact that both claims, convention and reconvention, were closely related, this statement is supported by Jurisprudence Number 1527 K/Sip/1973. The legal consequence of rejecting both claims are that the dispute object is not under collateral confiscation status.

References

Ardiansyah, F. H., Alfitra, & Elda, T. (2020). Upaya Hukum Peninjauan Kembali dalam Perkara Perdata (Studi Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 118 K/PK/Pdt/2018. Journal of Legal Research, 2 (2), 292. https://doi.org/10.15408/jlr.v2i2.14638.

Bahsan, M. (2007). Hukum Jaminan dan Jaminan Kredit Perbankan Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Harahap, M. Y. (2019). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Harahap, M. Y. (2005). Ruang Lingkup Permasalahan Eksekusi Bidang Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Het Herziene Indonesisch Reglement (HIR).

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata.

Lontulung, P. E. (1998). Peranan Yurisprudensi Sebagai Sumber Hukum. Jakarta: Konsil Kedokteran Indonesia.

Mertokusumo, S. (2013). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia Edisi Revisi. Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 346 K/Sip/1975.

Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Timur Nomor 2616/Pdt.G/2019/PA JT

Putusan Pengadilan Agama Jakarta Timur Nomor 452/Pdt.G/2023/PA JT.

Rachmainy, L., & Rahmawati, E. (2017). Penerapan Rekonvensi Sebagai Hak Istimewa Tergugat dalam Perkara Perceraian (Talak) di Pengadilan Agama. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum D'Jure, 2 (2), 310-311. https://doi.org/10.35706/dejure.v2i2.1306.

Rasaid, M. N. (2008). Hukum Acara Perdata. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Sambe, N. N. (2016). Fungsi Jaminan Terhadap Pemberian Kredit oleh Pihak Bank Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 10 Tahun 1998. Lex Crimen, 5 (4), 76.

Sitorus, S. (2018). Upaya Hukum dalam Perkara Perdata (Verzet, Banding, Kasasi, Peninjauan Kembali, dan Derden Verzet. Jurnal Hikmah, 15 (1), 64.

Soepomo, R. (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata Pengadilan Negeri. Jakarta: Pradnya Paramita.

Soeroso, R. (2011). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Sutantio, R. W., & Oeripkartawinata, I. (2019). Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek Edisi Revisi. Bandung: CV Mandar Maju.

Tjahjani, J. (2013). Sita Jaminan Sebagai Upaya Menjamin Terlaksananya Putusan Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Hukum Unisla, 1 (1), 58, https://doi.org/10.30736/ji.v1i1.6.

Undang-Undang Nomor 4 Tahun 1996 tentang Hak Tanggungan Atas Tanah Beserta Benda-Benda yang Berkaitan dengan Tanah.

Untung, B. (2005). Kredit Perbankan di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Published

2024-06-27

How to Cite

Fauziyah Rahmah Izzati, Linda Rachmainy, & Sherly Ayuna Putri. (2024). Studi Kasus Gugatan dalam Rekonvensi tentang Pengangkatan Sita Jaminan pada Perkara Perlawanan dalam Putusan Nomor 452/Pdt.G/2023/PA JT. Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 2(3), 138–149. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i3.1365