Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Menghadapi Praktik Overclaim Kandungan Produk Skincare: Analisis Kesesuaian dengan Hasil Uji Laboratorium

Authors

  • Sinta Rahmawati Universitas Tadulako
  • Sutarman Yodo Universitas Tadulako
  • Adiguna Kharismawan Universitas Tadulako

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v4i3.3217

Keywords:

BPOM, Consumer Protection, Overclaim, Product Claims, Skincare

Abstract

The rapid growth of Indonesia’s skincare industry has led to an increase in overclaim practices, in which product content or claimed benefits do not correspond to laboratory test results. This practice potentially harms consumers and violates Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection and regulations issued by the Indonesian Food and Drug Authority (BPOM). This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches to examine overclaim violations during 2023–2025. The results indicate that overclaim practices violate Articles 4, 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the Consumer Protection Law, as well as BPOM regulations requiring scientifically valid and accountable product claims. Laboratory findings reveal significant discrepancies between the declared and actual active ingredient contents, demonstrating misleading information that may harm consumers. Although the existing legal framework provides comprehensive protection, its effectiveness remains constrained by weak oversight of digital marketing practices and low levels of consumer legal literacy. Legal protection is available through BPOM administrative sanctions, dispute resolution through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK), and civil and criminal legal remedies. Strengthening supervision, consumer education, and business compliance is therefore essential to ensure effective consumer protection.

References

Arifin, G., Anandy, W., Patila, M., & S., I. F. (2022). Penyuluhan hukum tentang mahasiswa sebagai motivator perlindungan konsumen di Kota Palu. Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(1), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.54082/jamsi.190

Damari, L. K., & Damayanti, R. (2025). Peran Dinas Perdagangan dalam pengawasan terhadap overclaim produk kosmetik. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 10.

Hardiantoro, A., & Pratiwi, I. E. (2023, August 18). Beredar narasi dugaan sunscreen palsu, nilai SPF tak sama dengan yang tertera di kemasan. Kompas.com. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2023/08/18/143000365/beredar-narasi-dugaan-sunscreen-palsu-nilai-spf-tak-sama-dengan-yang?page=all

Idharudin, T. (2023). Heboh produk White Tomato Skincare milik dr. Richard Lee diduga cuma tempel stiker, tidak mengandung White Tomato. Populis.id. https://populis.id/read53680/heboh-produk-white-tomato-skincare-milik-dr-richard-lee-diduga-cuma-tempel-stiker-tidak-mengandung-white-tomato

Kuncoro, A. A. P., & Syamsudin, M. (2024). Perlindungan konsumen terhadap overclaim produk skincare. Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual: Climate Change and The Rule of Law, 1, 14.

Maulana, A., & Renggani, P. D. (2025). Eksploitasi klaim berlebihan dalam etika pemasaran dan implikasi hukum terhadap perlindungan konsumen. PENG Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 2. https://doi.org/10.62710/bbda0m55

Miru, A., & Yodo, S. (2019). Hukum perlindungan konsumen (Edisi revisi). Rajawali Pers.

Ngabito, R. I. P. (2025). Analisis pertanggungjawaban hukum terhadap pengedaran produk skincare yang terbukti overclaim. Law, Development and Justice Review, 7(3), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.7.2024.284-301

Pakaila, J. R., Aydin, R. M., & Abbiyya, S. W. (2024). Analisis etika terapan pada produk skincare di Indonesia. 9(14), 504–510.

Piyo, S., Munawwarah, S., & Kadir, M. K. K. (2025). Rekonstruksi peran reaktif BPOM terhadap pengawasan overclaim produk skincare. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis (J-Kumbis), 3(1), 33–44.

Rahmawati, K., & Permana, E. (2025). Analisis overclaim marketing dalam membangun kepercayaan konsumen pada produk Daviena Skincare. Jurnal Bisnis, Ekonomi Syariah, dan Pajak, 2(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.61132/jbep.v2i2.1051

Revanda, H. (2024). BPOM perketat pengawasan skincare overclaim, izin bisa dicabut. Tempo.co. https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/bpom-perketat-pengawasan-skincare-overclaim-izin-bisa-dicabut--4212

Setiyawati, D. (2023). Aspek hukum yang mengatur tanggung jawab owner skincare terhadap retur produk atas overclaim produk Daviena Skincare di Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Humaniora Publikasi, 5. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i6.5537

Syamsudin, M. (2021). Mahir meneliti permasalahan hukum. Kencana.

Tantra, M. A. L. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha atas overclaim di kandungan skin care pada produk retinol serum ElsheSkin. Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 2. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v2i5.1210

Waluyo, D. (2025). Pasar kosmetik Indonesia melesat 48 persen, peluang IKM berinovasi. Indonesia.go.id. https://indonesia.go.id/kategori/editorial/8516/pasar-kosmetik-indonesia-melesat-48-persen-peluang-ikm-berinovasi?lang=id

Downloads

Published

2026-09-01

How to Cite

Sinta Rahmawati, Sutarman Yodo, & Adiguna Kharismawan. (2026). Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Menghadapi Praktik Overclaim Kandungan Produk Skincare: Analisis Kesesuaian dengan Hasil Uji Laboratorium. Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 4(3), 08–18. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v4i3.3217

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.