Analisis Penerapan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule Terhadap Keputusan Direktur Utama PT Krakatau Steel Tbk Dalam Kasus Pembangunan Blast Furnace Complex

Anindita Maharani; Nadya Hanifah; Nyulistiowati Suryanti; Deviana Yuanitasari

doi:10.59059/mandub.v2i1.873

Authors

Anindita Maharani Universitas Padjadjaran
Nadya Hanifah Universitas Padjadjaran
Nyulistiowati Suryanti Universitas Padjadjaran
Deviana Yuanitasari Universitas Padjadjaran

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i1.873

Keywords:

Business Judgement Rule, Corruption, PT Krakatau Steel

Abstract

In business activities in the form of a Company, there are often legal problems involving directors as a result of the decisions and policies they make in carrying out their duties and authority in the company. The Board of Directors is one of the most important organs in a Limited Liability Company whose duty is to run the company as stated in Law Number 40 of 2007 (UU PT) concerning Limited Liability Companies. In the event of a loss caused by the decision or policy, the board of directors can be sued personally either criminally or civilly. This research aims to analyze the case of former President Director of PT Krakatau Steel (KS) Fazwar Bujang in making decisions on the construction of the Blast Furnace Complex plant in 2011 which is considered to have harmed the state of Rp 2.3 trillion and USD 292 or up to Rp 6 trillion and has benefited the MCC Ceri consortium, a company from China and PT Krakatau Engineering and others. The first result shows that the business judgment rule doctrine is a concept in corporate law that provides protection to company directors regarding the decisions and policies they make, to ensure that directors can make decisions based on good faith, prudence, and the best interests of the company without having to be personally liable for losses that may arise from business decisions. In Indonesia, the business judgment rule doctrine is only regulated in UU PT, but it has not been regulated in the law completely. Second, in the case of the construction of PT Krakatau Steel's Blast Furnace Complex, the business judgment rule cannot be applied because the business policies taken do not meet the requirements of the business judgment rule stipulated in Article 97 paragraph (3) of the UU PT.

References

Peraturan Perundang-Undangan

Undang Undang Nomor 47 Tahun 2007 Tentang Perseroan Terbatas.

Undang Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2003 Tentang Badan Usaha Milik Negara.

Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 Tahun 2012.

Buku

Bryan A. Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary, Thompson Group : America. 2010.

Hendra S. Boen, Bianglala Business Judgment Rule, Jakarta : Tatanusa, 2008.

Munir Fuady, Perbuatan Melawan Hukum (Pendekatan Kontemporer), PT Aditya Citra Bhakti, Bandung: 2005.

Mulyana, Business Judgment Rule Praktik Peradilan Terhadap Penyimpangan Dalam Pengelolaan BUMN/BUMD, Jakarta : Grasindo, 2018.

Jurnal

Hotasi Nababan, Hukum Tanpa Takaran: Penjara Korupsi Bagi Korban Penipuan, Q-Communication, Jakarta: ISSN: 2614-3542 EISSN: 2614-3550 2015.

Mas Putra Zenno Januarsyah, Dwidja Priyatno, Agung Sujati Winata, Khairul Hidayat. Penerapan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Karen Agustiawan. p-ISSN : 2541-2345, e-ISSN : 2580-8842.

Mira Widyawati, Nyulistiowati Suryanti, Kilkoda Agus Saleh. Tindakan Direksi yang Memberikan Corporate Guarantee terhadap Anak Perusahaan, Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum P-ISSN: 2528-7273 E-ISSN: 2540-9034 Volume 3, Nomor 1, September 2018.

Sartika Nanda Lestari, Business Judgment Rule Sebagai Immunity Doctrine Bagi Direksi Badan Usaha Milik Negara Di Indonesia, ISSN:2086-1702, Vol. 08 Nomor 2 September 2015.

Shigeko Desiputri Hadi, Prinsip Business Judgment Rule Dalam Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Direksi BUMN Yang Melakukan Tindakan Investasi Yang Mengakibatkan Kerugian, Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Kenotariatan Fakultas Hukum Unpad ISSN: 2614-3542 EISSN: 2614-3550 Volume 4, Nomor 2, Juni 2021.

Teuku Syahrul Ansari, ‘Reminding State Enterprises (BUMN) Management Using the Principle of ’Business Judgment Rule’ : A Preliminary Note’, Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences 2, no. 3 (31 July 2019) diakses melalui https://doi.org/10.33258/birci.v2i3.390 Pada 6 Oktober 2023.

Rafika Annisa Sari, Ema Rahmawati, Deviana Yuanitasari. Kajian Yuridis Terhadap Tanggung Jawab Anggota Direksi Dan Dewan Komisaris Perusahaan Pembiayaan Pada Pemenuhan Syarat Keberlanjutan. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat, e-ISSN: 2798-5210, p-ISSN: 2798-5652, Volume 3, Nomor 6, Oktober 2023.

Lainnya

Willa Wahyuni, “Fungsi Rapat Umum Pemegang Saham Untuk Perusahaan Baru”, Diakses melalui https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/fungsi-rapat-umum-pemegang-saham-untuk-perusahaan-baru-lt63b7ecf86c177/?page=1 Pada 6 Oktober 2023.