Telaah Kritis Aksiologi Sains Modern Persepektif Naquid Al-Attas dan Implementasinya Dalam Komunikasi Ilmiah
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59059/mutiara.v2i4.1425Keywords:
Western Islam, Paradigma, AxiologyAbstract
The modern scientific revolution, which Thomas Kuhn said was caused by a shift in the scientific paradigm, brought major changes totechnological developments, especially in the 20th century. Apart from modern science bringing many benefits to humans, it turns out toobrings extraordinary side effects, including continuous natural damage and humanitarian disaster, as also statedby Naquib Al-Attas. The scientific challenges brought by Western culture have resulted in the development of modern science which is full of Western view of reality and truth. One of the elements of Western civilization is tragedy that shows the search the truth and nature and purpose of life are endless, so he is always in search, but never achieves what he wantssearching for. This perspective also influenced the development of modern science. This article attempts to explicitly highlight the effects aside from modern science, as well as Naquib Al-Attas's view of modern science from its axiological side. Method usedis an in-depth literature review. From this article it can be stated with certainty that the treasures of Islamic scholarship have providedfoundation for the development of knowledge, especially science. This is proven in the history of Islamic civilization, how the ulama and Muslim scientists provide clear signs in the development of science. One important aspect that needs to be considered is maqashid syari'ah for the development of science. The way of looking at nature as an object and humans as a subject must be referred to to the Islamic perspective of viewing reality and truth. Besides that, the paradigm of scientific development and progress Modernism must refer to a paradigm based on an Islamic worldview which emphasizes that development and progress are necessary focused on one constant thing, namely the purpose and meaning of human life as caliph on Earth. This frame of mind can become a reference for the scientific community to be able to truly play the role of caliph on Earth, so that they can prevent further natural damage and human disasters.
References
Afridi, M. A. (2013). Contribution of Muslim scientists to the world: An overview of some selected fields. Revelation and Science, 3(1), 47-46.
Al-Attas, S. M. (1995). Islam dan Filsafat Sains. Bandung: Mizan.
Al-Attas, S. M. (1995). Prolegomena to the Metaphysics of Islam: An Exposition to the Fundamental Elements of the Worldview of Islam. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.
Al-Attas, S. M. (2001). Risalah Untuk Kaum Muslimin. Kuala Lumpur: ISTAC.
Al-Attas, S. M. (2011). Islam dan Sekularisme. Bandung: PIMPIN.
Al-Attas, S. M. (2019). Tinjauan Ringkas Peri Ilmu dan Pandangan Alam. Kuala Lumpur: Ta'dib International.
Al-Migdadi, M. H. (2012). Issues in Islamization of knowledge, man, and education. Revue Académique des Études Sociales et Humaines, 7, 3-16.
Amirullah. (2015). Krisis ekologi: Problematika sains modern. Lentera, 17(1), 1-21.
Gonzalez, W. J. (2006). Prediction as scientific test of economics. In W. J. Gonzalez, Contemporary perspectives in philosophy and methodology of science (pp. 83-112). Netbiblo.
Hadi, S., & Anshari, A. (2020). Mendudukkan kembali makna ilmu dan sains dalam Islam. TASFIYAH: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 4(1), 91-112.
Hasib, K. (2020). Konsep Insan Kulli menurut Syed Muhammad Naquib Al-Attas. TASFIYAH: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 4(2), 87-112.
Ishaq, U. M. (2014). Menjadi Saintis Muslim. Depok: Indie Publishing.
Ishaq, U. M., & Daud, W. M. (2017). Ibn Haytham's classification of knowledge. Al-Jami'ah: Journal of Islamic Studies, 55(1), 189-210.
Islam, M. T., & Fawaz, E. T. (2017). Islamization of knowledge in Quranic perspective. Jurnal Studia Quranika, 2(1), 23-38.
Kashim, M. I., & Husni, A. M. (2017). Maqashid syari'ah in modern biotechnology concerning food products. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 12, 27-39.
Madani, R. A. (2016). Islamization of science. International Journal of Islamic Thought, 9, 51-63.
Mannan, M. A. (2016). Science and subjectivity: Understanding objectivity of scientific knowledge. Philosophy and Progress, 59(1), 43-72.
Mendie, P. J., & Ejesi, E. (2014). Logical positivist versus Thomas Kuhn. THE LEAJON: An Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 6(1), 197-216.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mutiara : Jurnal Penelitian dan Karya Ilmiah
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by-sa/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.