Analisis Logical Fallacy terhadap Masalah Lingkungan dan Pengelolaan Sumber Daya Alam di Media Sosial

Ridho Darman

doi:10.59059/mutiara.v4i3.3122

Authors

Ridho Darman Kementerian Agraria dan Tata Ruang/BPN

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mutiara.v4i3.3122

Keywords:

Land Conversion, Logical Fallacy, Logical Flaw, Natural Disaster, Spatial Planning

Abstract

This study aims to identify and analyze the logical fallacies that arise in public conversations about environmental issues and natural resource management on Indonesian social media using a descriptive qualitative approach. Data were collected through scraping techniques using the Python programming language and subsequently analyzed using an informal logic framework to identify various forms of fallacious reasoning. The findings reveal the presence of multiple fallacies that substantially influence public understanding of causal relationships within environmental dynamics. These fallacies contribute to oversimplification, shifts in attention away from scientific evidence, and the emergence of distorted perceptions regarding structural factors in spatial planning and natural resource governance. This study contributes to environmental communication scholarship by emphasizing the importance of critical thinking literacy in improving the quality of public deliberation and supporting the formulation of evidence-based environmental policies.

References

Adhi, Y. T. (2022). Sesat Pikir Dalam Tuturan Warganet di Facebook. Jurnal Bahasa, Sastra Dan Pembelajarannya, 12(2), 264. https://doi.org/10.20527/jbsp.v12i2.10942

Amali, A. R., & Priatna, W. B. (2025). Peran Kampanye Digital di Instagram @Rekamnusantara Dalam Meningkatkan Partisipasi Publik. Journal Media Public Relations, 5(1), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.37090/jmp.v5i1.2557

Andini, L. A. (2025). Media Sosial sebagai Ruang Digital Activism Generasi Muda Dalam Memperjuangkan Isu Lingkungan. Ganaya: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 8(4), 127–137. https://doi.org/10.37329/ganaya.v8i4.4937

Bratama, A. A. (2025). Manajemen Media Sosial Akun Official Persiba Bantul Dalam Pergelaran Liga 3 DIY. Universitas Muhammadiyah Yogyakarta. https://etd.umy.ac.id/id/eprint/49384/

Bustami. (2024). Logika Informatika. Banda Aceh: UIN Ar-Raniry. https://fst.ar-raniry.ac.id/wp-content/uploads/2025/11/Full-Modul-Logika-Informatika.pdf

Cleave, M. Van. (2025). Introduction to Logic and Critical Thinking. LibreTexts. https://batch.libretexts.org/print/Letter/Finished/human-26799/Full.pdf

Darman, R. (2023). Analisis Sentimen Twitter Terhadap Persyaratan BPJS di Kantor Pertanahan. Widya Bhumi, 3(2), 113–136. https://doi.org/10.31292/wb.v3i2.61

Gensler, H. J. (2010). The a to Z of Logic. Scarecrow Press. https://archive.org/details/atozoflogic0000gens/page/n3/mode/2up

Graff, M., Moctezuma, D., Miranda-Jiménez, S., & Tellez, E. S. (2022). A Python library for exploratory data analysis on twitter data based on tokens and aggregated origin–destination information. Computers and Geosciences, 159(September 2020), 105012. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cageo.2021.105012

Hidayat, A. R. (2018). Filsafat Berpikir Teknik-Teknik Berpikir Logis Kontra Kesesatan Berpikir. Pamekasan: Duta Media Publishing. https://repository.iainmadura.ac.id/65/1/FILSAFAT LOGIKA LENGKAP DENGAN COVER.pdf

Marzuki, Hadad, A., & Ratulangi, D. (2025). Retorika dan Teknik Debat Politik. Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Akademik, 2(4), 560–574. https://ejurnal.kampusakademik.co.id/index.php/jmia/article/view/5689

Muharam, A. (2022). Dialog Eristis dan Falasi Logis (Analisis Dialog Musa AS dan Firaun dalam Surat al-Syua’rā [26]: 16-29). Al-Tadabbur: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir, 7(2), 173–190. https://jurnal.staialhidayahbogor.ac.id/index.php/alt/article/view/3249

Murtadho, R. (2016). Agama dan Krisis Ekologi: Ketidakmampuan Para Tokoh dan Kiai Melawan Dosa Semen di Rembang Jawa Tengah. NIZHAM: Jurnal Studi Keislaman, 4(2), 237–252. https://e-journal.metrouniv.ac.id/index.php/nizham/article/view/920

Prastya, D. E., & Zahra, A. A. (2021). Keterlibatan Aktor Internasional Non Negara Dalam Mempengaruhi Isu Lingkungan di Indonesia. Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasita’, 12(1), 11–21. https://doi.org/10.47030/administrasita.v12i1.40

Pusvita, E. A., Ranggup, D. S. P., & Arfan, U. (2025). Implementasi Machine Learning untuk Analisis Sentimen Opini Publik Mengenai Pembukaan Kebun Kelapa Sawit di Papua. MALCOM: Indonesian Journal of Machine Learning and Computer Science, 5(4), 1396–1405. https://doi.org/10.57152/malcom.v5i4.2279

Rahmawati, D. (2018). Risiko Polarisasi Algoritma Media Sosial : Kajian Terhadap Kerentanan Sosial dan Ketahanan Bangsa. Jurnal Kajian Lemhanas RI, 6(1), 37–49. jurnal.lemhannas.go.id/index.php/jkl/article/view/114

Rosen, K. H. (2019). Discrete Mathematics and its Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill. https://cis.temple.edu/~latecki/Courses/CIS2166-Fall25/RosenDiscreteMath8Ed.pdf

Tindale, C. W. (2007). Fallacies and Argument Appraisal. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511806544

Ulfah, M., Elma, Safitri, S. N., & Jannah, N. W. (2025). Kontribusi Ilmu Mantiq Dalam Membedah Kekeliruan Berfikir (Fallacy) di Media Sosial. Jurnal Penelitian Nusantara, 1(6), 462–470. https://doi.org/10.59435/menulis.v1i6.366

Wardani. (2015). Islam Ramah Lingkungan: Dari Eko-teologi al-Qur‘an Hingga Fiqh al-Bî‘ah. Banjarmasin: IAIN Antasari Press. https://idr.uin-antasari.ac.id/5183/1/Islam Ramah Lingkungan.pdf