Kepastian Hukum Pemeriksaan Notaris oleh Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Wilayah (MKNW) Terkait Pembatalan Persetujuannya oleh Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara

Yan Aprilia Indah Permatasari; Anriz Nazaruddin Halim; Felicitas Sri Marniati

doi:10.59059/mutiara.v4i3.3398

Authors

Yan Aprilia Indah Permatasari Universitas Jayabaya
Anriz Nazaruddin Halim Universitas Jayabaya
Felicitas Sri Marniati Universitas Jayabaya

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mutiara.v4i3.3398

Keywords:

Legal Certainty, Legal Consequences, Letter of Consent, Notary Honorary Council, Notary

Abstract

For the purposes of judicial proceedings, investigators, public prosecutors, or judges—subject to the approval of the Notary Honorary Council (MKN)—are authorized to obtain photocopies of the original deed (minuta akta) and summon a Notary for examination. This authority is intended to support the judicial process while simultaneously providing legal protection for Notaries suspected of committing criminal violations. The research addresses the legal consequences of a court ruling that annuls the approval previously granted by the Regional Notary Honorary Council (MKNW) for the examination of a Notary, as well as the legal certainty regarding the examination of a Notary by the MKNW in light of the court's annulment of said approval. This study employs R. Soeroso’s Theory of Legal Consequences and Jan Michiel Otto’s Theory of Legal Certainty. A normative-juridical research method is used, incorporating statutory, case, analytical, and conceptual approaches. Legal materials were gathered through the identification and inventory of legislation, literature, journals, and other sources, and subsequently analyzed using grammatical and systematic interpretation as well as legal construction via analogy. The research findings indicate that the court's annulment of the approval for a Notary's examination extinguishes the legal status and relationships derived from the MKNW's approval letter; this eliminates the rights and obligations of the parties involved and necessitates the MKNW's revocation of the previously issued approval. Such annulment embodies legal certainty and reaffirms the MKNW's obligation to exercise its authority in accordance with applicable legal regulations.

References

Ali, M. N., Musa, N., & Rahman, M. R. bin A. (2022). Judicial control over administrative discretion in Iraq. Hasanuddin Law Review, 8(3), 233–247. https://doi.org/10.20956/halrev.v8i3.3876.

Allan, T. R. S. (2023). Constitutionalism at common law: The rule of law and judicial review. The Cambridge Law Journal, 82(2), 236–264. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000819732300017X

Anand, G., Nugraha, X., Abidin, I. K. R., & Putri, D. (2025). Constitutionality of approval of the Notary Honorary Council in the process of investigation of criminal actions: A constitutional disobedience. Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum, 9(2), 306–326. https://doi.org/10.24198/jbmh.v9i2.1317.

Azizah, M. L. (2022). Kajian Yuridis Penandatanganan Akta yang dilakukan Notaris di Luar Kantor berdasarkan Alasan-Alasan tertentu. Notary Law Journal, 1(4), 345-354. https://doi.org/10.32801/nolaj.v1i4.17.

Chng, K. (2024). Re-examining judicial review of delegated legislation. Legal Studies, 44(1), 81–98. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2023.7.

Dani, U. (2018). Memahami Kedudukan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Di Indonesia: Sistem Unity Of Jurisdiction Atau Duality Of Jurisdiction? Sebuah Studi Tentang Struktur Dan Karakteristiknya/Understanding Administrative Court In Indonesia: Unity Of Jurisdiction Or Duality Of Jurisdiction System? A Study Of Hierarchy And Characteristic. Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan, 7(3), 405-424. https://doi.org/10.25216/jhp.7.3.2018.405-424.

Delaney, E. F. (2022). The federal case for judicial review. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42(3), 733–757. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab043.

Foran, M. (2022). The cornerstone of our law: Equality, consistency and judicial review. The Cambridge Law Journal, 81(2), 249–272. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000819732200023X.

Gentile, G. (2023). Effective judicial protection: Enforcement, judicial federalism and the politics of EU law. European Law Open, 2(1), 128–143. https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2022.48.

Harseptian, A. M. M., & Shara, M. C. P. (2023). Fungsi Majelis Kehormatan Notaris dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap Notaris yang tersangkut kasus pidana. Acta Comitas: Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan, 8(2), 352–365. https://doi.org/10.24843/AC.2023.v08.i02.p11.

Hickey, T. (2022). Legitimacy—not justice—and the case for judicial review. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42(3), 893–917. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqac009

Mardiansyah, A., Adisti, N. A., Rs, I. R., Nurliyantika, R., & Ramadhan, M. S. (2020). Kewenangan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris Pada Proses Penyelidikan Suatu Perkara Tindak Pidana Yang Melibatkan Notaris. Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan, 9(1), 48-58. https://doi.org/10.28946/rpt.v9i1.596.

Nabila, S., & Santoso, B. (2023). Peran Majelis Kehormatan Notaris dalam proses peradilan terhadap Notaris wilayah Lampung. Notarius, 16(2), 1013–1028. https://doi.org/10.14710/nts.v16i2.39009.

Nicolosi, S. F. (2024). The European Border and Coast Guard Agency (Frontex) and the limits to effective judicial protection in European Union law. European Law Journal, 30(1–2), 149–164. https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12512

Nishigai, K. (2022). Two types of formalism of the rule of law. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42(2), 495–520. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab039.

Nugraha, M. A. (2022). Persetujuan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris atas pemanggilan Notaris dalam pemeriksaan tindak pidana. Officium Notarium, 1(2), 403–413. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol1.iss2.art20.

Nurhasaniah, N., Rizanizarli, R., & Suhaimi, S. (2022). The position of Regional Notary Honorary Council in providing the approval toward the Notary audit in the investigation process. Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran, 22(1), 49–67. https://doi.org/10.18592/sjhp.v22i1.4843.

Passalacqua, V., & Costamagna, F. (2023). The law and facts of the preliminary reference procedure: A critical assessment of the EU Court of Justice’s source of knowledge. European Law Open, 2(2), 322–344. https://doi.org/10.1017/elo.2023.26

Permana, T. C. I., & Amiludin, A. (2024). A new era in the implementation of rehabilitation and compensation rulings in State Administrative Courts. Journal of Law and Legal Reform, 5(3), 1129–1154. https://doi.org/10.15294/jllr.v5i3.14524.

Putri, V. S., Ahmad, A., & Muhtar, M. H. (2024). Protection of human rights in the execution of forced attempts against State Administrative Court decisions: Perlindungan HAM dalam eksekusi upaya paksa terhadap putusan Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. Jurnal Konstitusi, 21(3), 392–412. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2133.

Putusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 569 K/TUN/2019 juncto Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara Medan Nomor 119/B/2019/PT.TUN-MDN juncto Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Tanjungpinang Nomor 13/G/2018/PTUN-TPI.

Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara Medan Nomor 246/B/2018/PT.TUN-MDN juncto Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Medan Nomor 77/G/2018/PTUN-MDN.

Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Tata Usaha Negara Surabaya Nomor 156/B/2017/PT.TUN.SBY juncto Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Surabaya Nomor 21/G/2017/PTUN.SBY.

Ruiz-Tagle, S. (2024). From discretion to expert judgement: Recasting sedimented concepts in administrative law. The Cambridge Law Journal, 83(3), 549–580. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0008197324000473

Saifulloh, M. R. (2022). Examination and confiscation of notarial deeds for the purpose of criminal law enforcement without approval from the Notary Honorary Council. Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure, 22(4), 423–436. https://doi.org/10.30641/dejure.2022.V22.423-436.

Sayer, T. (2024). Statutory interpretation and the administrative state: Refocusing the purposivist/intentionalist debate. Legal Studies, 44(3), 437–457. https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2023.44.

Wahyudiono, T., Fahamsyah, E., Prakoso, B., & Pramono, G. E. (2025). Reformulation of the approval of the Honorary Council of Notaries in providing recommendations for the interests of the court. Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Sharia Economics (IIJSE), 8(1), 8617–8636. https://doi.org/10.31538/iijse.v8i1.8065.

Williams, R. (2022). Rethinking administrative law for algorithmic decision making. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 42(2), 468–494. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab032

Yulius, Y., & Utama, Y. J. (2024). Optimizing the role of State Administrative Court decisions in state financial recovery. LAW REFORM, 20(1), 34–53. https://doi.org/10.14710/lr.v20i1.61779.

Zaky, I. (2023). Politik hukum persetujuan Majelis Kehormatan Notaris dalam memberikan ijin pemanggilan Notaris oleh penyidik. Officium Notarium, 2(3), 487–496. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol2.iss3.art11.

Zulkhainen, Q. U. R. (2023). Analisis yuridis Pasal 66 ayat (1) Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris terhadap pengawasan Notaris. Officium Notarium, 2(1), 120–129. https://doi.org/10.20885/JON.vol2.iss1.art13.