Manajemen Risiko dalam Proyek Konstruksi Studi Kasus Evaluasi dan Rekomendasi Proyek Konstruksi Perumahan PT Dharma Sakti
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59059/jupiekes.v2i1.841Keywords:
Increase in population, risk identification, risk aspects, high risk, significant risk, low riskAbstract
This research focuses on identifying and analyzing risks that can affect the implementation of housing construction projects in response to increasing population. A survey method using a questionnaire was used to collect data from stakeholders regarding housing construction projects. The results of risk identification based on events and consequences show that K3L and bureaucratic, natural and information aspects are high risks based on events, while social and location, external, planning and implementation management aspects are significant risks based on events. Based on consequences, natural aspects and government policies are considered high risk, while social, location and internal aspects are considered significant risk. Principal Component Analysis (PCA) confirmed these findings. The implications of the results of this research include the need to adopt proactive strategies in risk management, strengthening capacity in dealing with critical risks, government involvement in addressing policy and natural risks, as well as emphasizing social and location aspects in planning and implementing housing construction projects. These findings can serve as a basis for improving risk management in the context of uncertainty in the implementation of residential construction projects and the development of more effective industrial policies.
References
Anonimous, 1995. Australian / New Zealand Standard Risk Management. Standards Association of Australia.
Avianti, R. A., dan G. Margono. 2008. Aplikasi Analisis Faktor Untuk Menentukan Validitas Konstruksi Skala Sikap Diferensial Semantik Terhadap Kalkulus. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains dan Teknologi II, Hal 47-57
DeCoster, J. 1998. Overview of Factor Analysis. Retrieved from http://www.stat-help.com
Fahirah, F., R. B. Adihardjo, dan T. J. Wahyu Adi. 2005. Faktor-Faktor Penyebab Terjadinya Overrun Biaya Pada Proyek Konstruksi Gedung Di Makassar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen Teknologi I.
Flanagan, R., and G. Norman. 1993. Risk Management and Constructions. Blackwell Science Ltd. Oxford.
Ho, R. 2006. Handbook of Univariate and Multivariate Data Analysis and Interpretation with SPSS. Chapman and Hall /CRC. Boca Raton.
Julius, A. H., dan I. P. Artama. 2008. Analisa Resiko Terhadap Waktu Penyelesaian Proyek Pada Pembangunan Perumahan-Perumahan Di Surabaya. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen Teknologi VIII.
Kerzner, H. 2001. Project Management. A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controlling. Seventh Edition. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York.
Latupeirissa, J. E., P. F. Marzuki, dan R. D. Wirahadikusumah. 2005a. Manajemen Resiko Dalam Proyek Konstruksi Berdasarkan Perspektif Kontraktor. Prosiding Seminar Peringatan 25 Tahun Pendidikan MRK di Indonesia.
Latupeirissa, J. E., P. F. Marzuki, dan R. D. Wirahadikusumah. 2005b. Nilai Total Resiko Dalam Pelaksanaan Proyek Konstruksi Akibat Kondisi-Kondisi Ketidakpastian. Prosiding Seminar Peringatan 25 Tahun Pendidikan MRK di Indonesia.
Proboyo, B. 1999. Keterlambatan Waktu Pelaksanaan Proyek : Klasifikasi Dan Peringkat Dari Penyebab Penyebabnya. Dimensi Teknik Sipil. Volume 1, No. 1. Hal 49-58.
Santoso, I. 1999. Analisa Overruns Biaya Pada Beberapa Tipe Proyek Konstruksi. Dimensi Teknik Sipil. Volume 1, No. 1. Hal 40-48.
Soeharto, I. 1997. Manajemen Proyek, Dari Konseptual sampai Operasional. Erlangga. Jakarta.
Sugiyono, 2007. Statistika Untuk Penelitian. Alfabeta. Bandung.
Tarore, H., dan R. J. M. Mandagi. 2006. Sistem Manajemen Proyek dan Konstruksi. Tim Penerbit Jurusan Teknik Sipil Fakultas Teknik. Universitas Sam Ratulangi. Manado.
Wijayanthi, S. 1999. Faktor–Faktor Penyebab Keterlambatan Waktu Pembangunan Proyek Gedung Negara Di Lingkungan Pemerintah Kota Kediri. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Manajemen Teknologi I.
