Penggunaan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Hukum Perdata di Indonesia

Authors

  • Monica Maharani Dewi Universitas Tidar
  • Tarisa Dinar Alifia Universitas Tidar
  • Sebastian Sitohang Universitas Tidar

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i3.1416

Keywords:

evidence, electronic, civil

Abstract

Proving civil cases involving electronic documents and information electronic evidence which is now legalized has become electronic evidence that can be trusted (legitimate) and has been regulated in Article 1866 of the Civil Code in conjunction with Article 184 HIR in conjunction with Article 5 paragraph (1) and paragraph (2) Law Number 11 of 2008 concerning ITE. Panel of Judges in assess whether electronic information is Electronic Evidence valid based on a digital forensic assessment. Even though it is related to assessment procedures electronic evidence using digital forensics is regulated in the ITE Law and Law others, but in civil trial practice the method is not necessarily used digital forensics because there are technical obstacles. Additionally, Law Civil Procedure in Indonesia has not improved specifically regarding electronic evidence in civil evidence. So there is no procedure that regulates how how to present electronic evidence in civil trials. Without it yet This regulation actually results in legal uncertainty regarding the procedures These electronic devices are shown in civil trials. Given that there are obstacles in judicial practice, the State must immediately carry out reforms Civil Procedure Law in Indonesia regarding electronic evidence, can do this renewal of the evidence system to accommodate developments in evidence electronic documents submitted by the parties during the trial.

References

Ali, A., & Herwani, W. (2012). Asas-Asas Pembuktian Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Kencana.

Asimah, D. (2020). Menjawab Kendala Pembuktian Dalam Penerapan Alat Bukti Elektronik. Jurnal Hukum Peratun, 3(1), 97-110.

Dotulang, T. (2014). Keberadaan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata. Lex Privatum, 2(3), 147-148.

Dotulong, T. (2014). Keberadaan Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata. Jurnal Lex Privatum, 2(3), 147-148.

Harahap, M. Y. (2005). Hukum Acara Perdata: Gugatan, Persidangan, Penyitaan, Pembuktian, dan Putusan Pengadilan (Edisi ke-2). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Muhammad, A. (1990). Hukum Acara Perdata Indonesia. Bandung: Citra Aditya Bhakti.

Prodjodikoro, W. (1975). Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Bandung: Sumur Bandung.

Rizan, S. L., Nurjanah, & Yulian, E. (2022). Analisis Yuridis Kedudukan Dan Kepastian Hukum Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Perdata. Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik, 11(5), 441-442.

Soetantio, R. (2002). Hukum Acara Perdata dalam Teori dan Praktek. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Yusandy, T. (2019). Kedudukan Dan Kekekuatan Pembuktian Alat Bukti Elektronik Dalam Hukum Acara Perdata Di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan, Sains, dan Humaniora, 7(4), 650-651.

Published

2024-07-05

How to Cite

Monica Maharani Dewi, Tarisa Dinar Alifia, & Sebastian Sitohang. (2024). Penggunaan Alat Bukti Elektronik dalam Menyelesaikan Sengketa Hukum Perdata di Indonesia. Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 2(3), 292–302. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i3.1416

Similar Articles

1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.