Comparative Analysis of Business Judgment Rules in Civil Law and Common Law Systems

Authors

  • Sugiarto Sugiarto Universitas Borobudur
  • Sapta Eka Yanto Universitas Borobudur
  • Sudiyanto Sudiyanto Universitas Borobudur
  • Panji Riyadi Universitas Borobudur
  • Purnomo Purnomo Universitas Borobudur
  • Royan Siagian Universitas Borobudur
  • Zainal Arifin Hosein Universitas Borobudur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i4.1753

Keywords:

Civil Law, Common Law, Legal Comparison

Abstract

This study examines the comparative regulation of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) between countries adopting Civil and Common Law systems. BJR is a principle that grants corporate decision-makers the discretion to make business decisions without fear of legal liability, provided that the decisions are made in good faith, are reasonable, and free from conflicts of interest. This research aims to identify the similarities and differences in the regulation of BJR between civil law and common law countries and analyze the factors contributing to these differences. This research employs a normative juridical method with a legislative and comparative law approach. These approaches are utilized to analyze relevant national and international legislation and compare the application of BJR in Indonesia with that of other countries, such as the United States and European nations. The findings are expected to provide insights into the philosophical and practical differences in the regulation and implementation of BJR across these two legal systems.

References

Ais, C. (2017). Fiduciary duty sebagai standar para direksi dalam melaksanakan tugasnya. Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 31(1), 63-72.

Huda, M. (2020). Perbandingan sistem hukum. CV Cendekia Press.

Leonardy, J. (2024). Pengaruh yurispruden dalam sistem hukum Anglo-Saxon terhadap sistem hukum di Indonesia. Hukum Dinamika Excelensia, 6(1), 30-65.

Nasution, B. J. (2008). Metode penelitian ilmu hukum. Rineka Cipta.

Nugroho, W. A., & dkk. (2023). Sistem hukum & peradilan di Indonesia: Teori dan praktik. Sonpedia Publishing Indonesia.

Nurhardianto, F. (2015). Sistem hukum dan posisi hukum Indonesia. Jurnal TAPIs, 11(1), 34-45.

Portuna, C. D. (2024). Perbandingan hukum perjanjian menurut sistem hukum civil law dan common law: Suatu perbandingan antara Indonesia dan Amerika. Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI), 2(2), 369-374.

Prasetio. (2014). Dilema BUMN: Benturan penerapan business judgement rule (BJR) dalam keputusan bisnis direksi BUMN. Rayyana Komunikasindo.

Santoso, L. (2016). Perbandingan sistem civil law dan hukum Islam serta interaksinya dalam sistem hukum Indonesia. Istinbath Jurnal Hukum, 13(2), 189-222.

Sastrawidjaja, M. (2012). Kedudukan kekayaan PT (Persero) dalam rezim UU No. 17 Tahun 2003 tentang Keuangan Negara, sebuah pemikiran dari sisi hukum bisnis. Kompilasi Hukum Bisnis. CV Keni dan Fakultas Hukum Universitas Padjajaran.

Siagian, E. C., Sulaksana, H., Fernando, M. Z., Rachmawati, D. A., & Sumardi, S. (2021). Sejarah sistem hukum Eropa Kontinental civil law dan implementasinya di Indonesia. Jurnal Lex Specialis, 1(1), 43-37.

Downloads

Published

2024-11-29

How to Cite

Sugiarto Sugiarto, Sapta Eka Yanto, Sudiyanto Sudiyanto, Panji Riyadi, Purnomo Purnomo, Royan Siagian, & Zainal Arifin Hosein. (2024). Comparative Analysis of Business Judgment Rules in Civil Law and Common Law Systems. Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 2(4), 151–164. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i4.1753

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.