Resolusi Konflik Sosial dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam : Perspektif Sosiologi dan Antropologi

Authors

  • Huzaini Huzaini Universitas Islam Lampung
  • Rachmat Panca Putera Universitas Islam Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v1i3.2068

Keywords:

Islamic family law, social conflict, anthropological approach, sociological approach, conflict resolution

Abstract

This study examines social conflicts in Islamic family law (HKI) using sociological and anthropological approaches to understand the complex dynamics between religion, culture, and social values. The research aims to analyze the causes of conflicts, resolution patterns, and the contributions of socio-cultural approaches to creating effective and sustainable solutions. Employing a qualitative approach, the study utilizes case studies involving semi-structured interviews, participatory observations, and document analysis. The findings reveal that social conflicts in HKI are often triggered by imbalances in social structures, gender roles, and the influence of local traditions that diverge from formal legal norms. The sociological approach provides insights into interaction patterns and social mediation, while the anthropological approach highlights the importance of cultural values in conflict resolution processes. The study's implications emphasize the necessity of integrating Islamic legal principles of justice with local traditions to foster conflict resolution that is harmonious and socially relevant.

References

Ali, M. (2016). Islamic family law in a changing society. Jakarta: Kencana.

Azra, A. (2013). Islam dalam bingkai keindonesiaan dan kemanusiaan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Bowen, J. R. (2003). Islam, law, and equality in Indonesia: An anthropology of public reasoning. Cambridge University Press.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (2000). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. Penguin Books.

Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.

Giddens, A. (2006). Sociology. Cambridge: Polity Press.

Lederach, J. P. (1995). Preparing for peace: Conflict transformation across cultures. Syracuse University Press.

Merriam, S. B. (2009). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Rahman, F. (1982). Islam and modernity: Transformation of an intellectual tradition. University of Chicago Press.

Ritzer, G. (2011). Sociological theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods. Los Angeles: Sage.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-30

How to Cite

Huzaini Huzaini, & Rachmat Panca Putera. (2023). Resolusi Konflik Sosial dalam Hukum Keluarga Islam : Perspektif Sosiologi dan Antropologi. Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 1(3), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v1i3.2068

Similar Articles

<< < 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.