Bankruptcy as a Corporate Restructuring Mechanism and Its Implications for Corporate Governance and Stakeholder Protection

Hendro Widodo; Subianta Mandala

doi:10.59059/mandub.v4i2.3044

Authors

Hendro Widodo Universitas Borobudur
Subianta Mandala Universitas Borobudur

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v4i2.3044

Keywords:

Bankruptcy, Corporate Governance, Corporate Restructuring, Fiduciary Duty, Stakeholder Protection.

Abstract

Bankruptcy can no longer be understood solely as a mechanism for liquidating assets to meet debtor obligations, but has evolved into a restructuring instrument that directly impacts corporate governance and stakeholder protection. This study aims to analyze how bankruptcy functions as a corporate restructuring mechanism, how this process influences the redistribution of power in corporate governance, and the extent to which the bankruptcy legal system provides balanced protection for various stakeholders. The research method used is normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and limited comparative approach. The analysis is conducted on the provisions of Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and PKPU (Investment Suspension) and regulations related to corporate governance, combined with theoretical studies on fiduciary duty, stakeholder theory, and the corporate rescue paradigm. The results illustrate that bankruptcy functions as a governance restructuring mechanism that transfers control from the board of directors to the curator and creditor forum, thereby creating a redistribution of power within the company. The dominant creditor primacy orientation has the potential to create an imbalance in protection for non-creditor stakeholders, including workers and other economically impacted parties. These conditions indicate the need for normative reconstruction, including redefining fiduciary obligations during the insolvency phase, strengthening stakeholder protection, and harmonizing corporate governance principles with the insolvency law regime. This research is expected to contribute academically to the development of a bankruptcy model that is not solely focused on debt resolution but also considers aspects of business sustainability and substantive justice in modern corporate governance.

References

Al-Faryan, M. A. (2024). Agency theory, corporate governance and corruption: An integrative literature review approach. Cogent Social Sciences, 10(1), 2337893. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2024.2337893

Fauziyah, D. K. (2025). Analisis dugaan strategi korporasi dalam menyamarkan praktik kepailitan melalui skema kebangkrutan fiktif. PENG: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 2(4), 4409–4420. https://doi.org/10.62710/e3tmcv66

Hariyadi, H. (2020). Restrukturisasi utang sebagai upaya pencegahan kepailitan pada perseroan terbatas. SIGn Jurnal Hukum, 1(2), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.37276/sjh.v1i2.61

Hermawan, G. F. (2026). Rekonstruksi perlindungan hukum kreditur konkuren dalam sistem kepailitan Indonesia: Telaah keadilan distributif dan kepastian hukum. Al-Adl: Jurnal Hukum, 18(1), 128–147.

Komalasari, D. N. (2023). Pengaruh pengungkapan likuiditas, solvabilitas, ukuran perusahaan dan profitabilitas terhadap nilai perusahaan. Scientific Journal of Reflection: Economic, Accounting, Management and Business, 6(2), 470–479. https://doi.org/10.37481/sjr.v6i2.670

Luwinanda, A. M. (2024). Penerapan asas fiduciary duty terhadap direksi dalam perusahaan pailit. Jurnal Ilmiah Research Student, 1(3), 663–670.

Mariana, A. D. (2026). Comparison of Indonesian and US bankruptcy laws in the protection of creditors and debtors: Perbandingan hukum kepailitan Indonesia dan Amerika Serikat dalam perlindungan kreditor dan debitor. Academia Open, 11(1), 10–21. https://doi.org/10.21070/acopen.11.2026.13061

Muzacky, A., & [Nama penulis kedua tidak lengkap]. (2025). Evaluasi penerapan kebijakan hukum preventif berbasis good corporate governance terhadap risiko kepailitan di PT Sritex. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 8(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v8i1.7904

Nasyith, R. M. (2025). Reformasi sistem kepailitan Indonesia dalam perspektif keadilan restoratif dan kepastian hukum bagi kreditor dan debitor. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Riset Sosial Humaniora, 5(2), 152–163.

Nursaid, Y., & [Nama penulis kedua tidak lengkap]. (2020). Akibat hukum kreditur separatis atas penetapan masa insolvensi yang berlaku surut dalam proses kepailitan. Lex LATA, 2(3). https://doi.org/10.28946/lexl.v2i3.528

Pasyah, R. A. (2025). Penerapan fiduciary duty terhadap direksi dalam kasus pencurian aset oleh pekerja. Indonesian Journal of Legality of Law, 8(1), 53–57. https://doi.org/10.35965/ijlf.v8i1.7903

Saebani, A. R. (2024). Perlindungan hukum dan upaya pemulihan bagi perusahaan insolven dalam kepailitan. Jurnal Hukum Statuta, 3(2), 92–100. https://doi.org/10.35586/jhs.v3i2.9097

Sari, G. I. (2025). Corporate governance. Penerbit Naga Pustaka.

Sibarani, T. W. (2025). Tinjauan yuridis mengenai peran kurator dalam pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit. Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Riset Sosial Humaniora, 5(1), 13–20.

Simanjuntak, H. A. (2019). Penyelesaian utang debitur terhadap kreditur melalui kepailitan. Jurnal Justiqa, 1(1).

Sitompul, N. A. (2021). Konsep corporate rescue dalam kepailitan di Indonesia. Tanjungpura Law Journal, 5(1), 38–52. https://doi.org/10.26418/tlj.v5i1.43604

Stoelhorst, J. W. (2024). Beyond primacy: A stakeholder theory of corporate governance. Academy of Management Review, 49(1), 107–134. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2020.0268

Umaternate, A., & [Nama penulis kedua tidak lengkap]. (2026). Analisis yuridis peran kurator dalam pengurusan dan pemberesan harta pailit berdasarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 37 Tahun 2004 tentang Kepailitan dan PKPU. NUSANTARA: Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial, 13(1), 69–78.