Aspek Hukum Perlindungan Konsumen dalam Menghadapi Praktik Overclaim Kandungan Produk Skincare: Analisis Kesesuaian dengan Hasil Uji Laboratorium
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v4i3.3217Keywords:
BPOM, Consumer Protection, Overclaim, Product Claims, SkincareAbstract
The rapid growth of Indonesia’s skincare industry has led to an increase in overclaim practices, in which product content or claimed benefits do not correspond to laboratory test results. This practice potentially harms consumers and violates Law Number 8 of 1999 on Consumer Protection and regulations issued by the Indonesian Food and Drug Authority (BPOM). This research employs a normative juridical method using statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches to examine overclaim violations during 2023–2025. The results indicate that overclaim practices violate Articles 4, 7, 8, 9, and 10 of the Consumer Protection Law, as well as BPOM regulations requiring scientifically valid and accountable product claims. Laboratory findings reveal significant discrepancies between the declared and actual active ingredient contents, demonstrating misleading information that may harm consumers. Although the existing legal framework provides comprehensive protection, its effectiveness remains constrained by weak oversight of digital marketing practices and low levels of consumer legal literacy. Legal protection is available through BPOM administrative sanctions, dispute resolution through the Consumer Dispute Settlement Agency (BPSK), and civil and criminal legal remedies. Strengthening supervision, consumer education, and business compliance is therefore essential to ensure effective consumer protection.
References
Arifin, G., Anandy, W., Patila, M., & S., I. F. (2022). Penyuluhan hukum tentang mahasiswa sebagai motivator perlindungan konsumen di Kota Palu. Jurnal Abdi Masyarakat Indonesia, 2(1), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.54082/jamsi.190
Damari, L. K., & Damayanti, R. (2025). Peran Dinas Perdagangan dalam pengawasan terhadap overclaim produk kosmetik. Jurnal Panorama Hukum, 10.
Hardiantoro, A., & Pratiwi, I. E. (2023, August 18). Beredar narasi dugaan sunscreen palsu, nilai SPF tak sama dengan yang tertera di kemasan. Kompas.com. https://www.kompas.com/tren/read/2023/08/18/143000365/beredar-narasi-dugaan-sunscreen-palsu-nilai-spf-tak-sama-dengan-yang?page=all
Idharudin, T. (2023). Heboh produk White Tomato Skincare milik dr. Richard Lee diduga cuma tempel stiker, tidak mengandung White Tomato. Populis.id. https://populis.id/read53680/heboh-produk-white-tomato-skincare-milik-dr-richard-lee-diduga-cuma-tempel-stiker-tidak-mengandung-white-tomato
Kuncoro, A. A. P., & Syamsudin, M. (2024). Perlindungan konsumen terhadap overclaim produk skincare. Prosiding Seminar Hukum Aktual: Climate Change and The Rule of Law, 1, 14.
Maulana, A., & Renggani, P. D. (2025). Eksploitasi klaim berlebihan dalam etika pemasaran dan implikasi hukum terhadap perlindungan konsumen. PENG Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 2. https://doi.org/10.62710/bbda0m55
Miru, A., & Yodo, S. (2019). Hukum perlindungan konsumen (Edisi revisi). Rajawali Pers.
Ngabito, R. I. P. (2025). Analisis pertanggungjawaban hukum terhadap pengedaran produk skincare yang terbukti overclaim. Law, Development and Justice Review, 7(3), 284–301. https://doi.org/10.14710/ldjr.7.2024.284-301
Pakaila, J. R., Aydin, R. M., & Abbiyya, S. W. (2024). Analisis etika terapan pada produk skincare di Indonesia. 9(14), 504–510.
Piyo, S., Munawwarah, S., & Kadir, M. K. K. (2025). Rekonstruksi peran reaktif BPOM terhadap pengawasan overclaim produk skincare. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis (J-Kumbis), 3(1), 33–44.
Rahmawati, K., & Permana, E. (2025). Analisis overclaim marketing dalam membangun kepercayaan konsumen pada produk Daviena Skincare. Jurnal Bisnis, Ekonomi Syariah, dan Pajak, 2(2), 155–167. https://doi.org/10.61132/jbep.v2i2.1051
Revanda, H. (2024). BPOM perketat pengawasan skincare overclaim, izin bisa dicabut. Tempo.co. https://www.tempo.co/ekonomi/bpom-perketat-pengawasan-skincare-overclaim-izin-bisa-dicabut--4212
Setiyawati, D. (2023). Aspek hukum yang mengatur tanggung jawab owner skincare terhadap retur produk atas overclaim produk Daviena Skincare di Tangerang Selatan. Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum dan Humaniora Publikasi, 5. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v5i6.5537
Syamsudin, M. (2021). Mahir meneliti permasalahan hukum. Kencana.
Tantra, M. A. L. (2025). Pertanggungjawaban pelaku usaha atas overclaim di kandungan skin care pada produk retinol serum ElsheSkin. Jurnal Hukum, Pendidikan dan Sosial Humaniora, 2. https://doi.org/10.62383/aliansi.v2i5.1210
Waluyo, D. (2025). Pasar kosmetik Indonesia melesat 48 persen, peluang IKM berinovasi. Indonesia.go.id. https://indonesia.go.id/kategori/editorial/8516/pasar-kosmetik-indonesia-melesat-48-persen-peluang-ikm-berinovasi?lang=id
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.






