Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelanggaran Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil oleh Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Kupang

Authors

  • Weli Phelpina Elisabet Malubala Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Yohanes G. Tuba Helan Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Nusa Cendana
  • Norani Asnawi Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Nusa Cendana

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i1.971

Keywords:

Violation of Discipline, Civil Servant, State Administrative Court

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the settlement of disputes over violations of civil servant discipline by the Kupang State Administrative Court. This research method is normative legal research. The location of this research was conducted at the Kupang State Administrative Court Office. The type of data used in this research is normative research, the data used is secondary data. Data collection techniques that will be carried out are through literature studies and also interviews with sources, namely judges.  Data processing techniques in this research conduct studies or analyses in a descriptive juridical and prescriptive juridical manner on legal materials. The result of this research is that the types of employment disputes examined, decided and resolved by PTUN Kupang are generally 2 (two) types, namely disputes due to disciplinary punishment and disputes due to rotation, mutation / promotion and / or filling positions. The subject of litigation specifically for employment disputes is an active and/or former civil servant acting as a plaintiff against a state administrative body or official. The state administrative decision being challenged or the object of the dispute is a decision relating to disciplinary punishment or rotation, transfer/promotion or filling a position against a Civil Servant. The procedure or process of examining civil service disputes at the PTUN is basically the same as examining state administrative disputes in general, namely through 3 (three) processes, namely, the Administrative Process, the Examination Process and the Trial Process, with an examination using a choice of procedural law, namely the Ordinary Procedure, Fast Procedure or Short Procedure.

References

Asshidiqqie, Jimly. 2014. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Rajawali Press, Jakarta.

Bunga, Nicolaus Pira dan Pekuwali, Umbu L. 2012. Teori dan Metode Perundang-Undangan. FH Undana, Kupang.

Dahlan Thaib, Kedaulatan Rakyat, Negara Hukum dan Konstitusi, 2000, Libert. Yogyakarta.

Djuharie, O. Setiawan. 2011. Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi-Tesis-Disertassi. Yrama Widya, Bandung.

Fuady, Munir. 2013. Teori-Teori Besar (grand theory) Dalam Hukum. Kencana. Jakarta.

Huda, Ni’matul. 2013. Hukum Tata Negara Indonesia. Rajawali Press, Jakarta.

Kanisius. 2007. Ilmu Perundang-Undangan 2, Proses dan Teknik Pembentukannya., Yogyakarta.

Marbun, S.F. 2012. Hukum Administrasi Negara I. UII Press, Yogyakarta.

Marzuki, Mahmud Peter. 2005. Penelitian Hukum Edisi Revisi. Kencana, Jakarta.

Ngani, Nico. 2012. Bahasa Hukum dan Perundang-Undangan. Pustaka Yustisia, Yogyakarta.

Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 6 Tahun 2018 tentang Pedoman Penyelesaian Sengketa Administrasi Pemerintah.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 11 Tahun 2017 tentang Manajemen Pegawai Negeri Sipil.

Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 53 Tahun 2010 tentang Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil

R. Soegijatno Tjakranegara. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara di Indonesia. SinarGrafika, 2002.

Rahardjo, Soejipto. 2014. Ilmu Hukum. PT. Citra Aditya Bakti, Bandung.

Ridwan HR, Hukum Administrasi Negara, UII Pres,Yogyakarta.

Sidartha, Arif B. Penerj. 2009. Meuwissen Tentang Pengembangan Hukum, Ilmu Hukum, Teori Hukum, dan Filsafat Hukum. Refika Aditama, Bandung.

Simanjuntak, Enrico. Hukum Acara Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara Transformasi dan Refleksi. Sinar Baru Algensindo, 2018.

sipp.ptun-kupang.go.id

Soehino. 1984. Asas-Asas Hukum Tata Pemerintahan. Liberty, Yogyakarta.

Soemaryono, SH dan Anna Erliyana, SH.,MH. Tuntunan Praktek Beracara di Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara. PT. Pramedya Pustaka, Jakarta, 1999.

Sri Hastuti Puspitasari, 2007, Urgensi Independensi dan Restrukturisasi Kekuasaan Kehakiman di Indonesia.

Susanti, Dyah Ochtarina dan Efendi, A’an. 2014. Penelitian Hukum (Legal Research). Sinar Grafika, Jakarta.

Tanya, Bernard L, Simanjuntak, Yoan N dan Hage, Markus Y. 2010. Teori Hukum, Strategi Tertib Manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi. Genta Publishing, Yogyakarta.

Undang-Undang Dasar Negara Republik Indonesia Tahun 1945 (setelah diamandemen).

Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.

Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2014 tentang Apartur Sipil Negara.

Undang-Undang Nomor 51 Tahun 2009 tentang Perubahan Kedua Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.

Undang-Undang Nomor 9 Tahun 2004 tentang Perubahan Atas Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1986 tentang Peradilan Tata Usaha Negara.

Wijaya, Asri. 2011. Strategi Belajar Argumentasi Hukum. Lubuk Aggung, Bandung.

Downloads

Published

2024-01-02

How to Cite

Weli Phelpina Elisabet Malubala, Yohanes G. Tuba Helan, & Norani Asnawi. (2024). Penyelesaian Sengketa Pelanggaran Disiplin Pegawai Negeri Sipil oleh Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Kupang. Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 2(1), 387–399. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i1.971

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.