Analisis Butir Soal Ranah Kognitif pada Soal PSAJ Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMK Al-Furqon Bantarkawung

Authors

  • Aryanti Aryanti Universitas Peradaban
  • Alfinatus Syahroh Universitas Peradaban
  • Cintya Nurika Irma Universitas Peradaban

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/perspektif.v3i3.2606

Keywords:

Cognitive, Evaluation, Questions, Vocational School

Abstract

Learning evaluation is a process of assessing the achievement of learning objectives. The research aims to determine the cognitive domain contained in the questions created by the class XII Indonesian language teacher at Al-Furqon Bantarkawung Vocational School. This research method uses qualitative methods. The data source for this research is Indonesian PSAJ questions. Data collection techniques in this research used observation, interviews, and question documents. The researcher's technical data analysis using the assessment of PSAJ questions was carried out using the cognitive domain. This cognitive domain consists of 6 levels which cover students thinking abilities from the lowest to the highest. Teachers can plan learning and determine the types of questions that suit students' abilities in analyzing Indonesian language evaluations. The cognitive domain outlines six levels of response in the thinking process, namely: The results in this study contain 6 questions, the first is knowledge, knowledge based on cognitive level indicators, the ability to name is a characteristic of category (C1), Second, comprehension, there are two questions, this question is included in comprehension, the cognitive objective of this question is the stage of understanding (C2), Third the application of data based on cognitive level indicators (C3), Fourth Analysis (analysis) the ability to explain is a characteristic of the category (C4), Fifth Synthesis: There is one data based on the question above which is included in the cognitive domain category because students are asked to combine the correct parts to make one unit (C5). The six assessments (evaluation) and one question data above are included in the category (C6), because students are asked to compare texts 1 and 2 in the analysis of Indonesian PSAJ questions.

References

Agustina, M., Mayrita, H., & Muchti, A. (2018). Analisis butir soal ulangan akhir semester mata pelajaran bahasa Indonesia kelas XI. Jurnal Ilmiah Bina Edukasi, 11(1), 26–35.

Arifin, Z. (2009). Evaluasi pembelajaran: Prinsip, teknik, prosedur. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.

Damayanti, dkk. (n.d.). Analisis tingkat kesukaran butir soal pilihan ganda pada penilaian tengah semester kelas IV. Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar FKIP Untan Pontianak.

Fitriani, A., & Budiman, I. (2022). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis berdasarkan Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 8(1).

Gunawan, I., & Palupi, A. R. (2016). Taksonomi Bloom–revisi ranah kognitif: Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran, dan penilaian. Premiere Educandum: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Pembelajaran, 2(2).

Handayani, L., & Suryani, D. (2021). Analisis kualitas butir soal menggunakan pendekatan Taksonomi Bloom revisi. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Pengajaran, 5(2), 98–105.

Irina, F. (2017). Metode penelitian terapan. Yogyakarta: Parama Ilmu.

Magdalena, I., Prabandani, R. O., & Rini, E. S. (2021). Analisis Taksonomi Bloom sebagai alat evaluasi pembelajaran di SDN Kosambi 06 Pagi. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar dan Humaniora, 3(1).

Oktaviana, D., & Prihatin, I. (2018). Analisis hasil belajar siswa pada materi perbandingan berdasarkan ranah kognitif revisi Taksonomi Bloom. Buana Matematika: Jurnal Ilmiah Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika, 8(2), 81–88.

Pratiwi, R. N., & Suparman, S. (2020). Penggunaan Taksonomi Bloom dalam penyusunan soal evaluasi pembelajaran. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 11(2), 87–95.

Ramdhani, M. A., & Hidayat, A. (2019). Evaluasi pembelajaran sebagai alat ukur keberhasilan pendidikan. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia, 8(3), 345–352.

Sari, A. S. D. (2019). Analisis butir soal kognitif Taksonomi Bloom revisi pilihan ganda dan uraian pada materi momentum dan impuls. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Indonesia, 2(1).

Utari, R., Madya, W., & Pusdiklat KNPK. (2011). Taksonomi Bloom. Jurnal Pusdiklat KNPK, 766(1), 1–7.

Wahyuni, S., & Kurniasih, N. (2022). Implementasi Taksonomi Bloom dalam asesmen hasil belajar siswa sekolah dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Nusantara, 7(1), 50–58.

Yusuf, M. (2018). Evaluasi pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.

Downloads

Published

2025-07-07

How to Cite

Aryanti Aryanti, Alfinatus Syahroh, & Cintya Nurika Irma. (2025). Analisis Butir Soal Ranah Kognitif pada Soal PSAJ Mata Pelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di SMK Al-Furqon Bantarkawung. Perspektif : Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Ilmu Bahasa, 3(3), 30–40. https://doi.org/10.59059/perspektif.v3i3.2606

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.