Pelaksanaan Hak Ex Officio Hakim Atas Nafkah Iddah, Mut’ah, Hadlonah dan Madhiyah dalam Perkara Cerai Gugat Ditinjau dari Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2017

Analisis Putusan No.2675/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Kab.Kdr

Authors

  • Ayu Cahyani Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri
  • Muhammad Fajar Sidiq Widodo Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri
  • Mohammad Hendy Musthofa Institut Agama Islam Negeri Kediri

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i3.1391

Keywords:

Ex Officio Rights, Maintenance, Divorce, Perma Number 3 of 2017

Abstract

The ex officio right is the right possessed by the judge to decide more or other than what is submitted in the lawsuit, with the ex officio right, the judge can concretely impose decisions that prevent women from becoming victims of post-divorce economic violence while still being guided by the limitations set out in the applicable laws and regulations. economic rights of women after divorce such as iddah maintenance, mut'ah maintenance, hadlonah maintenance and madhiyah maintenance. This research uses empirical research with a legal sociology approach. The data sources obtained are secondary data sources and primary data sources. While the acquisition of data obtained from the contents of the decision, the results of interviews with Religious Court Judges who decided the case, as well as other supporting literature. And the research stage is carried out by conducting interviews with sources, compiling data from the results of interviews, and making research reports. The results of this discussion can be concluded as follows: The application of the ex officio rights of the panel of judges in case number 2675/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Kab.Kdr is in accordance with PERMA No. 3 of 2017. Although the Plaintiff has filed for the fulfillment of the rights of iddah, mut'ah, hadlanah, and madhiyah maintenance, but in the trial there were differences in the facts submitted by the Plaintiff and the Defendant so that in order to resolve the debate, the panel of judges used their ex officio rights to provide legal certainty and justice for the Parties

References

Abror, K. M. H. (2017). Hukum perkawinan dan perceraian. Yogyakarta: Ladang Kata.

Ahmad, R. (2014). Penemuan hukum oleh hakim dalam perspektif hukum progresif. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Anggota IKAPI. (2010). Undang-Undang kekuasaan kehakiman dan Mahkamah Agung. Bandung: Fokus Media.

Arif, F. (1992). Pengantar metode penelitian kualitatif. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Briliansyah, V. (2022). Tinjauan hukum Islam dan UU No.1 Tahun 1974 terhadap pemenuhan hak-hak anak pasca cerai (Studi kasus putusan nomor 816/Pdt.G/2021/PA.CN di Pengadilan Agama Cirebon). IAIN Syekh Nurjati.

Departemen Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (1998). Kamus besar bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Fuadi, A. S., & Saputra, D. E. (2020). Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI), 1(1). https://jdih.mahkamahagung.go.id/ artikelPenerapan asas fiksi hukum dalam PERMA, diakses 26 Mei 2024.

Harahap, M. Y. (2005). Kedudukan kewenangan dan acara peradilan agama, UU No. 7 Tahun 1989 (Edisi kedua). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Harahap, M. Y. (2009). Hukum acara perdata tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian dan putusan pengadilan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Mertokusumo, S. (2013). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia (Cetakan ke-6). Yogyakarta: Cahaya Atma Pustaka.

Nazwa, N., Authory, M. N., Ilham, M., & Patrajaya, R. (2022). Tinjauan Kompilasi Hukum Islam terhadap hukum perceraian. Tahkim (Jurnal Peradaban dan Hukum Islam), 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.29313/tahkim.v5i1.9314.

Puspa, Y. P. (1997). Kamus hukum. Semarang: Aneka.

Putri, R. S., & Ma’ruf, A. (2018). Implementasi Mahkamah Agung Nomor 3 Tahun 2017 tentang pedoman mengadili perkara perempuan berhadapan dengan hukum terhadap perkara cerai gugat di Pengadilan Agama Tanjung Karang. Jurnal, Universitas Negeri Lampung, 164.

Ramulyo, M. I. (2024). Hukum perkawinan. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Republik Indonesia. (2009). Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang kekuasaan kehakiman.

Sarmanu. (2017). Dasar metodologi penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif dan statistika. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press.

Sema nomor 3. (2018).

Subekti, I., & Mahdi, S. S. (2005). Hukum perorangan dan kekeluargaan perdata barat. Jakarta: Gitama Jaya.

Syaifudin, M. (2012). Hukum perceraian. Palembang: Sinar Grafika.

Syarifudin, A. (2006). Hukum perkawinan Islam di Indonesia. Jakarta: Kencana Pranada.

Published

2024-07-02

How to Cite

Ayu Cahyani, Muhammad Fajar Sidiq Widodo, & Mohammad Hendy Musthofa. (2024). Pelaksanaan Hak Ex Officio Hakim Atas Nafkah Iddah, Mut’ah, Hadlonah dan Madhiyah dalam Perkara Cerai Gugat Ditinjau dari Perma Nomor 3 Tahun 2017: Analisis Putusan No.2675/Pdt.G/2023/PA.Kab.Kdr. Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 2(3), 226–246. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i3.1391

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.