Aspek Hukum Tata Negara Terhadap Pengangkatan dan Pemberhentian Hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i3.1420Keywords:
Appointment, Dismissal, Constitutional JudgesAbstract
This research was motivated by the dismissal of Aswanto as a constitutional judge by the DPR, who legally and constitutionally still served as a constitutional judge. This research aims to find out aspects of constitutional law related to the appointment and dismissal of constitutional judges and to find out the implications of Constitutional Court Decision Number 96/PPU-XVIII/2020and the implications of Aswanto's dismissal as a constitutional judge. This research uses normative legal research. With a statutory approach, conceptual approach and case approach. The results of this research are that constitutional judges are proposed by the President, the House of Representatives and the Supreme Court with a mechanism regulated separately by the institution that nominates constitutional judges while not violating the provisions of the Law and in its implementation it must be open with the principles of transparency, participatory, objective and accountable. The implications of the Constitutional Court Decision Number 96/PPU-XVIII/2020 provide legal certainty regarding the tenure of incumbent constitutional judges and maintain the independence and impartiality of constitutional judges. The DPR's action to dismiss Aswanto constitutes a legal vacuum (rechstvacuum) because there are no regulations governing the DPR's authority to dismiss constitutional judges. The legal implications that occurred in the dismissal of Judge Aswanto by the DPR included legal uncertainty, inconsistency between the DPR and the President in implementing statutory regulations, problems with the independence of constitutional judges, and leading to the invalidity of the Presidential Decree.
References
Ali, H. (2023). Implikasi pemberhentian hakim konstitusi oleh DPR terhadap independensi kekuasaan kehakiman: Perspektif hukum positif dan fiqh siyasah (Skripsi Fakultas Syariah Universitas Islam Negeri Kiai Haji Achmad Siddiq Jember).
Arikunto, S. (2002). Prosedur penelitian: Suatu pendekatan praktek. Rineka Cipta.
Febrinandez, H. L. (2018). Independensi hakim konstitusi dalam memutus perkara di Mahkamah Konstitusi (Skripsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas Padang).
Indrati, M. F. (2007). Ilmu perundang-undangan I. Kanisius.
Marzuki, P. M. (2005). Penelitian hukum. Kencana.
Nasution, W. A. (2023). Konstitusionalitas pengangkatan dan pemberhentian hakim konstitusi dalam sistem ketatanegaraan Indonesia (Tesis Direktorat Progam Pascasarjana Universitas Muhammadiyah Malang).
Palguna, I. D. G. (2018). Mahkamah Konstitusi: Dasar pemikiran, kewenangan, dan perbandingan dengan negara lain. Konstitusi Press.
Qurani, H. (2022). Melihat alasan pemberhentian hakim dalam UU Mahkamah Konstitusi. Retrieved December 10, 2022, from https://www.hukumonline.com/berita/a/melihat-alasanpemberhentian-hakim-dalam-uu-mahkamah-konstitusi-lt633a3a57a6505
Rishan, I. (2016). Redesain sistem pengangkatan dan pemberhentian hakim di Indonesia. Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM, 23(2), 165–185. https://doi.org/10.20885/iustum.vol23.iss2.art1
Wahyudin, A. (2023). Analisis hukum pengaturan pemberhentian hakim Mahkamah Konstitusi berdasarkan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 103/PPU-XX/2020. (Skripsi Fakultas Hukum Universitas Hasanuddin Makassar).
Wicaksono, A. (2023, October 2). Alasan DPR copot Aswanto dari jabatan hakim konstitusi. CNN Indonesia. Retrieved June 11, 2023, from https://www.cnnindonesia.com/nasional/20221002092202-32-855230/alasan-dpr-copot-aswanto-dari-jabatan-hakim-konstitusi
Yuswalina. (2019). Hukum administrasi negara. Setara Press.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.