Studi Perbandingan Kewenangan Antara MK Indonesia Dengan MK Korea Selatan Terkait Dengan Impeachment Presiden
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i1.1010Keywords:
Authority, Constitutional Court, Presidential ImpeachmentAbstract
Impeachment is carried out by authorized institutions against the president for alleged violations. The purpose of this writing is to compare impeachment in Indonesia and South Korea. To find out whether the impeachment process in Indonesia is possible to implement. Looking at the reasons for the dismissal of the President, South Korea has differences with Indonesia regarding the constitution. The process of dismissing the President in Indonesia needs to be reorganized and revised again regarding the correct regulatory provisions and in accordance with the concept of a country that adheres to and upholds democratic legal principles
References
Adhihernawan, M. Y. (2021). Telaah Efektivitas Mekanisme Pemberhentian Presiden Indonesia: Perbandingan Praktik Amerika Serikat dan Korea Selatan. Jurnal Kajian Pembaharuan Hukum, 246.
Arinanto, S. (2006). The Need of Conctitutional Court in Indonesia. Hukum dan Pembangunan, 387-393.
Asro, M. (2017). KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM UNDANG-UNDANG DASAR NEGARA REPUBLIK INDONESIA TAHUN 1945. 'Adliya, 163.
Fatkhuroman, & Sjuhad, M. (2010). MEMAHAMI PEMBERHENTIAN PRESIDEN (IMPEACHMENT) DI INDONESIA (Studi Perbandiangan Pemberhentian Presiden Soekarno dan Presiden Abdurrahman Wahid). Jurnal Konstitusi, 168.
Fudin, H. (2020). LEGAL JUSTICE IN PRESIDENTIAL IMPEACHMENT PRACTICE BETWEEN INDONESIA AND THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA. Jurnal Hukum Peradilan, 465-504.
Ginsburg, T. (2009). THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AND THE JUDICIALIZATION OF KOREAN POLITICS. New Courts in Asia, 5-11.
Ismail, & Hartati, S. (2020). PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN: Konsep Dasar Kehidupan Berbangsa dan Bernegara di Indonesia. Pasuruan: Qiara Media.
Mosler, H. (2017). The Institution of Presidential Impeachment in South Korea 1992-2017. Verfassung in Recht und Übersee, 119-120.
Pahlawan MP, H. R. (2020). The constitutional court function of the Indonesian state concerning system for the implementation impeachment of the president and/or vice president. Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist, 118-127.
Sianipar, D. S., Siburian, K., & Naibaho, R. (2019). TINJAUAN YURIDIS TERHADAP PEMBAGIAN KEWENANGAN PRESIDEN DAN WAKIL PRESIDEN MENURUT UNDANG -UNDANG DASAR 1945. PATIK : Hukum Untuk Perdamaian dan Kesejahteraan Masyarakat, 117-118.
Sibuea, H. (2021). Comparison of the Indonesian and South Korea Impeachment System as a Method of Power Limitation. BIRCI-Journal, 12445-12550.
Simamora, J. (2015). COMPARISON OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT AUTHORITY BETWEEN INDONESIA AND SOUTH KOREA. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 331-337.
Sunarto. (2016). PRINSIP CHECKS AND BALANCES DALAM SISTEM KETATANEGARAAN INDONESIA. Masalah-Masalah Hukum, 161.
Syawawi, R. (2010). Pengaturan Pemberhentian Presiden dalam Masa Jabatan Menurut UUD 1945 (Studi Komparatif Sebelum dan Sesudah Perubahan). Jurnal Konstitusi, 75-90.
Tinambuan, H. S. (2016). RECONSTRUCTION THE AUTHORITY OF CONSTITUTIONAL COURT ON IMPEACHMENT PROCESS OF PRESIDENT AND/OR IN INDONESIAN CONSTITUTIONAL SYSTEM. Jurnal Dinamika Hukum, 75.
Zen, N. W., Hananti, U. D., & Diamantina, A. (2016). JAMINAN HAK-HAK KONSTITUTIONAL WARGA NEGARA (THE PROTECTOR OF CITIZEN'S CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS) DENGAN IMPLEMENTASI CONSTITUTIONAL COMPLAINT MELALUI MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DI NEGARA KESATUAN REPUBLIK INDONESIA. Diponegoro Law Review, 5.
Zulfirman. (2002). Analisis Politik dan Hukum Pemilihan Presiden Secara Langsung. Jurnal Hukum, 158-169.
