Esensial Imparsialitas dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Hubungan Industrial
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v3i3.2749Keywords:
Mediation, Mediator, Civil Law, Industrial Relations Disputes, ImpartialityAbstract
In the modern industrialization era, industrial relations disputes are increasing in both quantity and complexity. This condition demands a fast, precise, fair, and efficient dispute resolution mechanism. In accordance with the provisions of laws and regulations, mandatory settlement efforts must first be pursued through bipartite or tripartite negotiations through deliberation to reach a consensus, known as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR). ADR is a dispute resolution mechanism outside the court that is oriented towards a win-win solution, namely an agreement that accommodates the interests of all parties. However, in practice, the implementation of mediation in Industrial Relations Disputes (PHI) still faces various obstacles, particularly related to the lack of the principle of impartiality of the mediator. This study uses a normative juridical method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of the study indicate that the PHI Mediator is an administrative position attached to the state civil apparatus, not an independent profession. The absence of strict sanctions for violations of the code of ethics, limited mediation time, and the absence of conflict of interest regulations in the Minister of Manpower Regulation No. Law No. 17 of 2014 makes the mediator vulnerable to intervention by certain parties. This situation has implications for the emergence of recommendations that are potentially non-objective and detrimental to one of the parties. Therefore, the principle of impartiality is a fundamental element in Industrial Relations (PHI) mediation to ensure a fair, balanced, and substantively just dispute resolution.
References
Astarini, D. R. S. (2020). Mediasi pengadilan: Salah satu bentuk penyelesaian sengketa berdasarkan asas peradilan cepat, sederhana, biaya ringan (Edisi 2). P.T. Alumni.
Bhaluta, R. I. (2002). Impartiality in court proceedings. Informatol, 55(1–2). https://doi.org/10.32914/i.55.1-2.6
Cekhukum.com. (2022, Oktober 18). Mediator hubungan industrial: Pengertian dan definisi. Cekhukum.com. https://cekhukum.com
Djunaedi, E. (2000). Laporan penelitian alternative dispute resolution (penyelesaian sengketa alternatif) dan connected dispute resolution (penyelesaian sengketa yang terkait dengan pengadilan). Mahkamah Agung RI.
Haq, H. S. (2020). Mediasi komunitas sebagai alternatif penyelesaian sengketa (Cet. 1). Lakeisha. https://doi.org/10.35334/ay.v2i2.1547
Hukumonline. (2022, Agustus 29). Definisi istilah hukum mediator hubungan industrial. Hukumonline. https://www.hukumonline.com
Julkipli, A., & Santoso, I. B. (2022). Peran mediator dalam upaya penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial melalui mediasi. Justitia: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora, 5(2), 259–267. Garuda Kemdikbud.
Keputusan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 108 Tahun 2016 tentang Pedoman Perilaku Mediator.
Marzuki, S. (2021). Imparsialitas hakim. Komisi Yudisial Republik Indonesia.
Muhammadiyah University Press. (2010). Mengenal penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial secara mediasi. In Mengenal penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial secara… (hlm. 1710–1719). Surakarta: Muhammadiyah University Press.
Peraturan Menteri Ketenagakerjaan dan Transmigrasi Republik Indonesia Nomor 17 Tahun 2014 tentang Pengangkatan dan Pemberhentian Mediator Hubungan Industrial serta Tata Kerja Mediasi.
Prasetio, B. (2024, Mei 2). Perhatikan hal ini agar mediasi menjadi efektif dalam penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial. BP Lawyers. https://bplawyers.co.id
Santoso, S. P. N. (2023, Maret 16). Prosedur PHK dari permit request principle ke notification principle. Hukumonline.com. https://www.hukumonline.com
Sutrisman. (2024). Peranan mediator dalam penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial antara pemberi kerja dengan pekerja/buruh. Seminar Nasional Hukum, Sosial dan Ekonomi, 3(1). Jurnal UMSU.
Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan.
Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2004 tentang Penyelesaian Perselisihan Hubungan Industrial.
Undang-Undang Nomor 48 Tahun 2009 tentang Kekuasaan Kehakiman.
Undang-Undang Nomor 6 Tahun 2023 tentang Penetapan Peraturan Pemerintah Pengganti Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2022 tentang Cipta Kerja menjadi Undang-Undang. https://doi.org/10.32528/nms.v2i4.312
Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. (n.d.). Fungsi dan peranan mediator hubungan industrial pada dinas (Permenaker No. 17/2014). Repository UNISSULA. https://repository.unissula.ac.id
Volosevici, D. (2021). Alternative dispute resolution and individual labour conflict: A different way of managing organizational disputes. Journal of Social and Legal Studies, 8(2).
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.