Analisis Sistem Kemitraan Digital pada PT X
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59059/maslahah.v3i3.2503Keywords:
algorithmic transparency, digital partnership, freelance workers, labor relations, MSMEsAbstract
This study explores the digital partnership system implemented by PT X in engaging with MSMEs and freelance workers. Using a qualitative case study approach, data were collected through in-depth interviews and participatory observation. The findings reveal that while PT X's platform facilitates economic opportunities, it also creates new forms of dependency and inequality. Algorithmic opacity, unbalanced revenue-sharing schemes, and limited user control challenge the fairness and sustainability of such partnerships. This study suggests that digital platforms must rethink their governance and algorithm design to ensure equitable and inclusive collaboration with partners in Indonesia.
References
Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 267–299.
Andrianto, A. (2023). Digital platform governance and partner dissatisfaction: A case study of Indonesian ride-hailing drivers. Faculty of Economics, University of Indonesia.
Bank Indonesia. (2023). Financing accessibility and digital platform partnership: Survey on micro-entrepreneurs in Java.
Berg, J. (2022). Digital labour platforms in developing countries: Drivers of inequality? ILO.
Cai, J., et al. (2022). App design and partner engagement in platform economy. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 38(5), 421–435.
Chen, L., et al. (2022). Fairness in platform-based partnerships: A contract analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 175(3), 587–605.
Chen, M. K., Rossi, P. E., Chevalier, J. A., & Oehlsen, E. (2020). The value of flexible work: Evidence from Uber drivers. Harvard Business Review, 98(4), 120–135.
Creswell, J. W. (2021). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (5th ed.). Sage.
fairwork Indonesia. (2022). Labour standards in the gig economy: Indonesia report 2022.
Graham, M., et al. (2021). Fairness in gig work: Evidence from Southeast Asia. Journal of Development Studies, 57(8), 1327–1343.
Guo, L., et al. (2021). Platform-based collaborative ecosystems: A new paradigm for digital business. Journal of Business Research, 129, 786–794.
Kartika, D., & Wijaya, S. (2023). Incentive system fairness in platform economy: Evidence from Indonesian food delivery partners. Journal of Southeast Asian Business Studies, 17(2), 45–62.
Kementerian Koperasi dan UKM Republik Indonesia. (2023). Peraturan Menteri Koperasi dan UKM No. 6 tahun 2023 tentang Perlindungan Mitra Digital.
Kenney, M., & Zysman, J. (2020). The rise of the platform economy. MIT Sloan Management Review, 61(3), 1–9.
Kuhn, K. M., & Maleki, A. (2020). Micro-entrepreneurs in the platform economy: Dependency and constraints. Work and Occupations, 47(1), 31–69.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (2020). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (4th ed.). Sage.
MIT Sloan School of Management. (2023). Blockchain applications for fair platform economy (Research Brief No. 23-105). https://mitsloan.mit.edu
Moleong, L. J. (2021). Metodologi penelitian kualitatif / Qualitative research methodology. PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nuraini, S., & Fahmi, I. (2023). Algorithmic distribution bias in ride-hailing platforms: Jakarta case study. Asian Journal of Technology Management, 16(1), 78–95.
Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Sage.
Porter, M. E., & Kramer, M. R. (2011). Creating shared value. Harvard Business Review, 89(1/2), 62–77.
Prasetyo, A. E., Susanto, H., & Nguyen, T. T. (2021). Digital platform partnership models in developing economies. Journal of Business Models, 9(3), 112–130.
Putra, R. P., Handayani, W., & Suryono, A. (2022). Digital literacy gaps among platform partners in Indonesia. International Journal of Digital Literacy, 13(4), 1–15.
Rahayu, S. K., & Hidayat, T. (2022). Profit-sharing fairness in Indonesian digital platforms. Journal of Cooperatives and SMEs, 14(2), 89–104.
Rahman, A., & Anwar, M. (2021). Profit sharing in platform-based UMKM partnerships: Evidence from West Java. Asian Journal of Business Ethics, 10(2), 245–263.
Rosenblat, A. (2020). Uberland: How algorithms are rewriting the rules of work. University of California Press.
Schor, J., et al. (2023). Platform work and worker satisfaction: A cross-national comparison. Journal of Consumer Culture, 23(1), 68–89.
Spradley, J. P. (2020). Participant observation. Waveland Press.
Srnicek, N. (2017). Platform capitalism. Polity Press.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kualitatif / Qualitative research methods. Alfabeta.
Suryana, A. (2023). Operational challenges of micro-entrepreneurs in digital platforms: West Java case study. Indonesian Journal of Business and Entrepreneurship, 9(1), 55–70.
UNESCO. (2023). Digital skills assessment for platform economy workers in Southeast Asia. UNESCO Bangkok Office.
Vallas, S., & Schor, J. B. (2020). What do platforms do? Understanding the gig economy. Annual Review of Sociology, 46, 273–294.
Woodcock, J. (2021). The algorithmic panopticon at work: How apps control gig workers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 36(3), 273–290.
Yin, R. K. (2021). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Sage.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Maslahah : Jurnal Manajemen dan Ekonomi Syariah
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
