A Quantitative Study On Teacher’s Personality Effect Towards Students’ Learning Motivation
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59059/perspektif.v1i3.423Keywords:
Teacher’s Personality, Students’ Learning Motivation, EFL StudentsAbstract
This study aims to understand the degree of correlation between teacher character and student learning motivation in the teaching and learning process of first year students at SMP Negeri 3 Terara. The sample of this study is that of all students of the SMP Terterara, a total of 60 students, and is divided into two groups: 30 students 1a and 30 students 1b. In this study, researchers used non-test technology by using a questionnaire-related instrument to collect data to express data about teachers' characteristics in the teaching process towards the motivation of students to learn. The analysis results showed that the maximum score was 46, the minimum score was 6, the average score was 23 and the standard deviation was 10.46, and 15 students received scores between 24-29. Based on the analysis of the teacher's character and the motivation of the students, r-count was found at 0.337 and the significant rank of 5% (5%) at 30, it was found at 0.361. The results of the teacher's hypothesis character showed that there was no correlation between the teacher's personality and the teaching of students.
References
Aldridge, J.M., Fraser, B.J., & Huang, T. (1999). Investigating Classroom Environments in Taiwan and Australia with Multiple Research Methods. Journal of Educational Research, 93, 48-62.
Arikunto, Suharsimi, 1998. Presudur Penelitian: Suatu Pendekatan Praktek. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta.
Arikunto, Suharsimi, 2003. Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan: Edisi Revisi. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksra.
Brauch, R. A., Goliath, C., Patterson, L., Sheers, T., & Haller, N. (2013). A qualitative study of improving preceptor feedback delivery on professionalism to postgraduate year 1 residents through education, observation, and reflection. The Ochsner journal, 13(3), 322–326.
Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: A review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1-44.
Dimyati dan Mudjiono, 2006. Belajar dan Pembelajaran : Jakarta, PT. Rineka Cipta
Fraser, B.J. (1982). Assessment of Learning Environments: Manual for Learning Environment Inventory (LEI) and My Class Inventory (MCI). Third Version.
Fraser, B.J., & Fisher, D.L. (1982). Predicting Students’ Outcomes from Their Perceptions of Classroom Psychosocial Environment.
Fraser, B.J., & O'Brien, P. (1985). Student and Teacher Perceptions of the Environment of Elementary School Classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 85, 567 - 580.
Harmer, J., 2002. The Practice of English Language Teaching: third Edition, Malaysia. Longman
Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
Higbea, R. J., Elder, J., VanderMolen, J., Cleghorn, S. M., Brew, R., & Branch, K. (2020). Interprofessional service-learning definition. Journal of interprofessional care, 34(2), 283–286. https://doi.org/10.1080/13561820.2019.1650729
J,.Herber Klausmeir and E. Ripple, Richard. 1971, Learning and Human Abilities, Education Psychology, third Edition
Kay, D., & Kibble, J. (2016). Learning theories 101: application to everyday teaching and scholarship. Advances in physiology education, 40(1), 17–25. https://doi.org/10.1152/advan.00132.2015
Marzano, R. J. (2003). What works in schools: Translating research into action. ASCD.
Nurgiantoro, 1995. Penelitian Dalam Pengajaran Bahasa dan Sastra. Yogyakarta, BPFE.
Stronge, J. H. (2007). Qualities of effective teachers. ASCD.
Tobin, K., & Fraser, B.J. (1998). Qualitative and Quantitative Landscapes of Classroom Learning Environments.
Wayan Nurkancana dan P.P.N. Sumartana. (1986). Evaluasi Pendidikan. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.
