Hak Ingkar Sebagai Alasan Pembenar Dihadapan Persidangan Pidana Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Jabatan Notaris

Authors

  • Yudan Fajar Mahendra Universitas Sebelas Maret

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i2.1163

Keywords:

legal consequences of authentic deeds, forgery of authentic deeds, notary protection

Abstract

Notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds. Authentic deeds have formal functions that cannot be carried out by other public officials, so they have strong evidentiary power. In relation to this background, the author considers the following issues: the responsibility and legal protection of notaries for the deeds they make. The method used in this research is normative research using the technique of collecting legal materials through literature study, using primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the research show that the elements of the criminal act of falsifying an authentic deed committed by a notary include fulfilling subjective elements by falsifying an authentic deed. Criminal sanctions for notaries involved in this criminal act are based on Articles 264 paragraph (1) and 266 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, which stipulate penalties for notaries who make a deed by deliberately using the deed as if its contents were true. From this discussion, it can be concluded that deeds that do not meet the requirements set out in statutory regulations do not have strong evidentiary power and do not have binding legal force.

References

Buku-Buku

Abintoro Prakoso. 2015. Modul Mata Kuliah: Etika Profesi Hukum pada Program Pascasarjana Magister Kenotariatan. Jember: Fakultas Hukum Universitas Jember.

Adjie. Habib. 2008. Hukum Notaris Indonesia (tafsir tematik terhadap UU No 30 tahun 2004 tentang jabatan notaris). Bandung: Refika Aditama.

A. Kohar. 1983. Notaris Dalam Praktek Hukum. Bandung: Alumni.

A.Kohar. 1984. Hak Ingkar Notaris Disimposiumkan, tulisan dalam Notaris Berkomunikasi. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni.

G.H.S. Lumban Tobing. 2009. Peraturan Jabatan Notaris. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Habib Adjie. 2008. Sanksi Perdata dan Sanksi Administratif Terhadap Notaris Sebagai Pejabat Publik. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Moeljatno. 1993. Asas-Asas Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Muhammad Syarifuddin. 2012. Hukum Perjanjian, Memahami Perjanjian dalam Perspektif Filsafat, Teori, Dogmatik, dan Praktik Hukum. Bandung: Mandar Maju.

Mukti Fajar dan Yulianto Achmad. 2017. Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif dan Empiris. Cetakan IV. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Notodisoerjo, Soegondo R. 2002. Hukum Notarial di Indonesia Suatu Penjelasan. Jakarta: Rajawali.

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. 2011. Penelitian Hukum. Cet. 7. Jakarta: Kencana.

Phillipus M. Hadjon. 1987. Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Rakyat Indonesia. Surabaya: PT. Bina Ilmu.

Saputro, A. D. 2010. Jati Diri Notaris Indonesia Dulu, Sekarang, dan Dimasa Datang. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka.

Soetandyo Wignjosoebroto. 2001. Profesi Profesionalisme dan Etika Profesi. Media Notariat.

Sudarto. 1983. Hukum Pidana dan Perkembangan Masyarakat, Kajian Terhadap Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Bandung: Bandung Angkasa.

Sudikno Mertokusumo. 2001. Hukum Acara Perdata di Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Suharnoko dan Endah Hartati. 2008. Doktrin Subrogasi, Novasi dan Cessie. Jakarta: Kencana Media Group dan Badan Penerbit FHUI.

Jurnal

Siahaan, K. 2019. Kedudukan Hukum Akta Notaris Sebagai Alat Bukti Pada Tindak Pidana Pemalsuan Surat Dalam Proses Peradilan Pidana. Recital Review. Vol 1, No (2), 72-88.

Downloads

Published

2024-04-24

How to Cite

Yudan Fajar Mahendra. (2024). Hak Ingkar Sebagai Alasan Pembenar Dihadapan Persidangan Pidana Bentuk Perlindungan Hukum Jabatan Notaris. Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum Dan Humaniora, 2(2), 88–111. https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v2i2.1163

Similar Articles

<< < 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.