Pemeriksaan Setempat dalam Sengketa Pembagian Harta Bersama
Studi Putusan Nomor 4757/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tgrs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v3i1.2166Keywords:
Descente, Joint Property, Judge’s Considerations.Abstract
This research aims to analyze the evidentiary strength of descente in disputes over the division of joint property based on a study of decision number 4757/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tgrs, as well as examining the judge's considerations in granting a lawsuit based on a study of decision number 4757/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tgrs. This research uses a normative approach with a case study method. The results of the research show that the strength of descente is independent (vrij bewijsleer), but not binding (dwingend bewijsleer). This means that the results of the descente do not absolutely determine the judge's decision, the judge's decision is still based on a free assessment of all evidence relevant to the case. The judge's considerations in this case stipulate that joint property must be divided fairly, namely that each party is entitled to half of the joint property, as regulated in Article 37 of Law Number 1 of 1974 and Article 97 of the Compilation of Islamic Law. The judge's considerations also show that the principles of justice and legal certainty are a priority, with reference to legal provisions governing the fair distribution of joint property. The decision taken accommodates the interests of both parties, and confirms that the absence of one party in the trial does not prevent decision-making based on the available evidence.
References
Ambarita, M. (2021). Kekuatan pembuktian pemeriksaan setempat (Gerechtelijke Plaatsopneming) dalam pemeriksaan sengketa perdata. Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia, 18(3), 385–393.
Baihaqi, I. F. (2020). Urgensi pemeriksaan setempat (descente) dalam sistem pembuktian perkara permohonan izin poligami (Studi Putusan Izin Poligami Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung Tahun 2016-2019). (Tesis). Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta.
Chania, A. (2017, Agustus). Pemeriksaan setempat (descente) sebagai faktor pendukung pembuktian dalam perkara perdata. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa, 1, 38–45.
Dalam proses pembuktian terhadap harta bersama yang tidak memiliki bukti kepemilikan (Putusan Nomor 0273/Pdt.G/2021/PA.BBU). (Tesis). Universitas Islam Negeri Raden Intan Lampung.
Harahap, Y. (2008). Hukum acara perdata tentang gugatan, persidangan, penyitaan, pembuktian dan putusan pengadilan (Cet. VIII). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.
Het Herziene Indlandsch Reglement.
Kho, I. (2021). Analisis atas pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus perkara perdata Nomor 304/Pdt.G/2016/PB. Btm ditinjau dari asas ultra petita partium dengan adanya tuntutan subsidair dalam gugatan ex aequo et bono. Jurnal Hukum Adigama, 4(1), 357–376.
Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Acara Perdata.
Mertokusumo, S. (2006). Hukum acara perdata Indonesia. Yogyakarta: Liberty.
Putusan Pengadilan Agama Tigaraksa Nomor 4757/Pdt.G/2022/PA.Tgrs.
Rechtreglement Buitengwesten.
Subekti, R., & Tjitrosudibio, R. (2017). Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.
Subekti. (1992). Pokok-pokok hukum perdata. Bandung: PT Intermasa.
Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung Nomor 7 Tahun 2001 tentang Pemeriksaan Setempat.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mandub : Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.