Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Penjatuhan Pidana terhadap Residivis Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan: Studi Putusan Nomor 7/PID.B/2023/PN KLA

Sukowati Sukowati; Fristia Berdia Tamza; Eko Raharjo; Firganefi Firganefi

doi:10.59059/mandub.v3i3.2648

Authors

Sukowati Sukowati Universitas Lampung
Fristia Berdia Tamza Universitas Lampung
Eko Raharjo Universitas Lampung
Firganefi Firganefi Universitas Lampung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/mandub.v3i3.2648

Keywords:

pertimbangan hakim, residivis, pidana pembunuhan, tindak pidana, efek jera

Abstract

Criminal law aims to maintain order and justice in society through the criminalization of criminals. One form of serious crime is the crime of murder, which is expressly regulated in the Criminal Code. This crime is a serious concern given the high impact it causes, especially when it is committed repeatedly or by a rwsidivis. The recidivism case of murder contained in Decision Number 7/Pid.B/2023/Pn Kla shows the complexity in the criminal sentencing process. The defendant had previously been convicted in a murder case, but returned to commit a similar crime shortly after his sentence. The prosecutor demanded a sentence of 15 years in prison, and the judge ruled in accordance with article 338 of the Criminal Code without applying the criminal burden as stipulated in the provisions on recidivism. This raises questions related to the basis of judge's consideration and its relevance to the purpose of criminal law, especially in providing a deterrent and justice effect for the community. The problem in this study is what is the basis for the judge's consideration in imposing a criminal sentence on a recidivist for the crime of murder, and whether the verdict has fulfilled the purpose of sentencing a recidivist perpetrator of the crime of murder.

References

Adonara, Firman Floranta (2015), Prinsip Kebebasan Hakim dalam Memutuskan Perkara Sebagai Amanat Konstitusi. Jurnal Konstitusi, Vol.12, No.2.

Baharudin dkk (2023), Tinjaun Yuridis Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan Berencana. Pagarayuang Law Journal, Vol.6, No. 2.

Efendi, Jonaedi dan Rijadi, Prasetijo, 2016, Metode Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris, Jakarta: Kencana.

Hairi, Prianter Jaya (2018), Konsep dan Pembaruan Residivisme dalam Hukum Pidana di Indonesia, Negara Hukum, Vol. 9, No. 2.

Hamzah, Imaduddin, dkk, 2020, Psikologis Penjara Penerapan dalam Proses Pemasyarakatan, CV. Ainun Media: Jombang.

Isnaini,Enik (2017). Tujuan Yuridis Normatif Perjudian Online Menurut Hukum Positif Di Indonesia. Jurnal Independent, Vol. 5, No.1.

Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP) UU No. 1 Tahun 2023

Laksmi C.D.M, I Gusti Ayu Devi dkk (2020). Penjatuhan Sanksi Terhadap Pelaku Tindak Pidana Pembunuhan (Studi Kasus Di Pengadilan Negeri Singara Dalam Perkara NO.124/PID.B/2019/PN.SGR). e-Journal Komunitas Yustisia Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, Vol.3,No.1.

Mustofa, Muhammad, 2013,Metotologi Penelitian Kriminologi, Jakarta: kencana.

Nurfatlah, Titin, Abadi, Sukma Hidayat Kurnia, dan Efendi, Saparudin (2024), Konsep Residive Dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Civil Law Attended In The Perspevrive Of Financial Objectives, Unizar Law Review, Vol. 7, Issue, 1.

Permanasari, Noviana (2021), Analisis Dasar Pertimbangan Hukum Oleh Hakim Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta Pusat No. 10/PID.SUS-TPK/2021/PT DKI, Syntax Idea, Vol.3, No.9.

Saudi, Arman, 2014, Sistem Pengawasan Badan Peradilan Di Indonesia, Depok: Raja Grafindo Persada.