Perkawinan Beda Agama dalam Penafsiran Muhammad Rasyid Ridha dan Hamka
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59059/al-tarbiyah.v1i2.324Keywords:
marriage, different religions, people of the bookAbstract
As for the background of this research, it is known that the issue of interfaith marriage has become a polemic and even relevant issue to be studied. This issue continues to be discussed by scholars because interfaith marriages are still common in socienty. Muhammad Rasyid Ridha and Hamka as mufassir where this social problem also occurs at a time when they feel responsible for finding legal solutions in the Qur’an to the problem of interfaith marriages that occur among these people. The results obtained from this study are: first, related to marriage between Muslim men and Muslim women. Their interpretation of the verse is that it is unlawful for a muslim man to marry a muslim women. However, according to Muhammad Rasyid Ridha, the word polytheist in the verse is of a special form, namely only Arab polytheists. While according to Hamka the polytheists in general. Second, releated to marriage between Muslim men and women of the peiple of the book. Their interpretation of the verse is that it is permissible for a Muslim man to marry a women of the people of the book. According to Muhammad Rasyid Ridha, the criteria of the scribes are as long as they have a holy book. Meanwhile, according to Hamka, the people of the book are only limited to Jews and Christians.
References
Sumber Buku
A. Athaillah, Rasyid Ridha Konsep Teologi Rasional Dalam Tafsir Al-Manar Erlangga, 2006).
Abdul Mustaqim, Metode Penelitian Al-Qur’an Dan Tafsir Yogyakarta: Idia Pres, 2015.
Hamka. Tafsir Al-Azhar. Jakarta: Gema Insani, 2015.
Quraish Shihab, Muhammad. Membumikan Al-Qur’an. Bandung: Mizan, 1994.
Rasyid Ridha, Muhammad. Tafsir Al-Manar ,Mesir: Darul Al-Manar, 1931.
Saiful Amin Ghafur, Mozaik Mufassir Al-Qur’an Dari Klasik Hingga Kontemporer Yogyakarta: Kaukaba Dipantara, 2013.
Sumber Jurnal
Abdullah, Dudung. “Pemikiran Syeikh Muhammad Abduh Dalam Tafsir Al-Manar” Vol. 1/ No. 1/ Desember (2012).
Andi, Nofri. “Tafsir Al-Manar Magnum Opsu Muhammad Abduh” Vol. 6. No. 1/ Juni (2006).
Daliati Simanjuntak. “Etika Berbaasa Persfektif Al-Qur’an.” Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, Vol. 3, no. 2, 2017.
Harahap, Ikhwanuddin. “Memahami Urgensi Perbedaan Mazhab Dalam Konstruksi Hukum Islam Di Era Millenial.” Jurnal Al-Maqasid: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan, Vol. 5, no. 1, 2019.
Hasibuan, Ummi Kalsum. “Keadilan Dalam Al-Qur’an (Interpretasi Ma’na Cum Maghza Terhadap Q,S, Al-Hujurat {49} Ayat 9),” Al-Fawatih: Jurnal Kajian Al-Qur'an dan Hadis, Vol. 1, no. 2, 2020.
Nasution, Muhammad Arsad. “Perceraian Menurut Kompilasi Hukum Islam (KHI) Dan Fiqh,” Jurnal el-Qanuniy: ssJurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial, Vol. 4, no. 2, 2018.
Sati, Ali. “Mengelola Konflik Dalam Rumah Tangga (Catatan Kecil Sebuah Pernikahan Dalam Islam)” Jurnal el-Qanuniy: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Pranata Sosial, Vol. 6. Nomor 2, 2020.
Siregar, Fatahuddin Aziz. “Dimensi Jender Dalam Hukum Kewarisan Islam.” Yurisprudentia: Jurnal Hukum Ekonomi, Vol. 1, no. 2, 2015.
Siregar, Khoiriah. “Fenomena Oax Dalam Al-Qur’an Persfektif Tafsir Maqasidi.” Al-Fawatih: Jurnal Kajian Al-Qur'an dan Hadis, Vol. 1, no. 2, 2020.
Siregar, Sawaluddin. “Mitos Larangan Pernikahan Semarga Di Sumatera Utara, Jurnal Al-Maqasid: Jurnal Ilmu Kesyariahan dan Keperdataan, Vol. 7, no. 1, 2021.
