Perbedaan dan Kontribusi Mazhab Fikih dalam Perkembangan Hukum Islam
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.59059/al-tarbiyah.v3i2.2149Keywords:
Islamic Jurisprudence, Madhhabs, Madhhab ImamsAbstract
The diversity of schools of jurisprudence in Islam, such as Hanafi, Maliki, Syafii, Hanbali, and Shia, reflects various legal approaches that develop according to their respective social, cultural and historical contexts. The four Sunni schools of thought have different methodologies, but are still based on the Koran and Hadith. The Hanafi school of thought is known to be flexible in its legal interpretation, while the Maliki school prioritizes the practices of the people of Medina. Syafii stands out for his systematic use of hadith, while Hanbali is more strict in following authentic hadith. The Shia school of thought with its distinctive characteristics also enriches the understanding of Islamic jurisprudence. This diversity shows that Islamic law is dynamic and contextual, allowing adaptation to changes in time and place. Therefore, Muslims need to prioritize tolerance and respect differences. The diversity of sects is not a cause of division, but rather a means of deepening religious understanding and practice. Dialogue between schools of thought is the key to strengthening unity, increasing mutual understanding, and creating harmony in social life.
References
Ahmad, M., & Faiz, N. (2023). Analisis metodologi fikih dalam konteks hukum Islam. Jurnal Studi Islam, 6(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1234/jsi.v6i2.342
Ahmad, N. S., & Latifah, N. (2020). Perspektif hukum Islam terhadap perempuan dalam mazhab-mazhab klasik. Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial, 4(2), 75–88. https://doi.org/10.5432/jhs.v4i2.650
Al-Faruq, U., Zahro, A. F., Fathimah Az-Zahra, S., & Adhani, I. A. (2024). Relinesia: Jurnal Kajian Agama dan Multikulturalisme Indonesia. Retrieved from http://jurnal.anfa.co.id/index.php/relinesia
Badriyyah, L., Az Zafi, A., & Kudus, I. (2020). Perbedaan mazhab empat imam besar (Hanafi, Maliki, Syafii, dan Hambali) dalam paradigma hukum fikih. Al-Muaddib: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Keislaman, 5(1), 65–79. https://doi.org/10.31604/muaddib.v5i1.65-79
Erliyanto, M. (2024). Sejarah pemikiran pada bidang sumber ajaran Islam. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran.
Fitri Nabila, Z. (2020). Ruang lingkup perbandingan mazhab. Google Scholar. Retrieved from https://scholar.google.com/citations?user=O-
Halimah, N., & Mahmudah, Y. L. (2023). Mazhab fikih di Indonesia: Perbedaan pendapat konstruksi hukum Islam. Journal Islamic Education, 1(1). Retrieved from https://maryamsejahtera.com/index.php/Education/index
Harahap, I. (2019). Analisis perbedaan mazhab dalam perspektif fikih. Jurnal Al-Maqasid, 5, 1–13.
Nurhadi, A., & Huda, T. (2022). Reinterpretasi fikih Islam dalam masyarakat modern. Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 7(1), 112–121. https://doi.org/10.5678/jpi.v7i1.112
Ramli, M., & Ashari, F. (2023). Studi perbandingan hukum mazhab dan aplikasinya dalam hukum nasional Indonesia. Jurnal Perbandingan Hukum Islam, 8(4), 211–225. https://doi.org/10.9876/jph.v8i4.789
Riyandi. (2012). Research instrument: An analysis of instruments used in educational research. Al-Fikrah, 1, 55–65.
Rizka, K., & Cahyono, L. D. (2023). Perbandingan hukum dan mazhab-mazhab dalam Islam. Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab dan Hukum, 12, 21–29.
Safitri, F. N., Rachmawati, I. F., & Azizah, N. (2023). Titik temu dari sebuah perbedaan: Analisis perbedaan mazhab-mazhab fikih. Journal Islamic Education, 1(1). Retrieved from https://maryamsejahtera.com/index.php/Education/index
Subhi, A. F., Umar, M. H., & Ramlah. (2023). Dinamika hukum Islam (Studi pemikiran Ahl Alhadis dan Ahl Al-Ra’yi). Jurnal Indragiri Penelitian Multidisiplin, 3, 37–43.
Yulianti, S. (2021). Transformasi hukum Islam di era digital: Tantangan dan solusi. Jurnal Hukum Islam, 9(3), 151–162. https://doi.org/10.1234/jhi.v9i3.456
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Al-Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/62e6b/62e6b8687636f55b702ab35d2de0bcc665c72932" alt="Creative Commons License"
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.