Analisis Komprehensif Teori Evaluasi Pendidikan dalam Pembelajaran

Authors

  • Ja'far Siddik Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak
  • Usman Usman Institut Agama Islam Negeri Pontianak
  • Nor Fadhilah Universitas Islam Malang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59059/al-tarbiyah.v4i3.3056

Keywords:

21st-Century Learning, Authentic Assessment, Educational Evaluation, Evaluation Models, Learning Evaluation

Abstract

Educational evaluation is an essential part of the learning process, serving to measure the achievement of educational goals and to continuously improve the quality of learning. This study aims to analyze educational evaluation theory in learning, including the basic concepts of evaluation, evaluation models and approaches, and their relevance to 21st-century learning. The study employed a qualitative approach with the Systematic Literature Review (SLR) method through a review of various reputable international journals published between 2020 and 2025. Research data was obtained from various scientific sources such as Scopus, ScienceDirect, Springer, Taylor & Francis, and Sage Journals. The results show that educational evaluation theory is evolving from outcome-oriented evaluation to a more holistic, authentic, and competency-based evaluation. Evaluation models such as Goal-Oriented Evaluation, formative and summative evaluation, the CIPP model, authentic assessment, and diagnostic assessment play an important role in supporting modern learning. In addition, the integration of digital technology in learning evaluation provides opportunities to create a more adaptive and contextual assessment system.

References

Afriadi, B., & Fitri, F. (2025). Curriculum evaluation model: Paradigm and implications in improving the quality of education. Jurnal Evaluasi Pendidikan, 16(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.21009/jep.v16i1.58117

Agisna, R., Jauhari, Z. A., Zuar, M. S., Sholihin, M., & Khusnul I., A. (2023). Evaluasi pembelajaran. Social Science Academic, 1(2), 353–362. https://doi.org/10.37680/ssa.v1i2.3582

Bulkani, Riadin, A., Ni'mah, N., & Setiawan, M. A. (2025). Impact of holistic learning models on character development: A systematic review. Obrazovanie i Nauka, 27(5), 111–141. https://doi.org/10.17853/1994-5639-2025-5-111-141

Fitriani, A. D., & Prasetyo, S. (2025). Suatu kajian literatur: Karakteristik dan asesmen pembelajaran abad 21 tentang penilaian autentik. BLAZE: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra dalam Pendidikan Linguistik dan Pengembangan, 3(2), 148–168. https://doi.org/10.59841/blaze.v3i2.2748

Fauzobihi, Rustomo, Annishia, F. B., & Ramadhina, R. (2022). Evaluation of study of research methodology courses (Implementation of Ralph W. Tyler's goal-oriented model program evaluation). Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 8(2), 1582–1586. https://doi.org/10.58258/jime.v8i2.3267

Hidayat, R., Sujadi, I., Siswanto, & Usodo, B. (2023). Description of assessment: Assessment for learning and assessment as learning on teacher learning assessment. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 7(4), 653–661. https://doi.org/10.23887/jere.v7i4.59950

Hira, H. H., Ernawati, Praptama, R., Andhika, M. R., & Driana, E. (2025). Challenges and teacher strategies in implementing authentic assessment: A case study at a state Islamic junior high school. Al-Fikrah: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 13(2), 160–174. https://doi.org/10.31958/jaf.v13i2.16021

Hurskaya, V., Mykhaylenko, S., Kartashova, Z., Kushevska, N., & Zaverukha, Y. (2024). Assessment and evaluation methods for 21st century education: Measuring what matters. Futurity Education, 4(4), 4–17. https://doi.org/10.57125/FED.2024.12.25.01

Jurāne-Brēmane, A. (2023). Digital assessment in technology-enriched education: Thematic review. Education Sciences, 13(5), Article 522. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci13050522

Kalyana, D., Hayatunnufus, G., Fauziah, F. H., Wijaya, H. R., Haryani, R., Sudarmaji, Sumarmia, Larashati, & Damayanti, F. (2025). Implementasi asesmen autentik berbasis kompetensi dalam pembelajaran abad ke-21. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, 4(2), 10521–10531. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i2.3665

Mohammadi Zenouzagh, Z., Admiraal, W., & Saab, N. (2025). Empowering students' agentive engagement through formative assessment in online learning environment. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-024-00498-7

Muhali. (2019). Pembelajaran inovatif abad ke-21. Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengkajian Ilmu Pendidikan: E-Saintika, 3(2), 25–50. https://doi.org/10.36312/e-saintika.v3i2.126

Pangestuningtyas, D., Nasution, Gunansyah, G., Mariana, N., & Faroh, N. I. (2025). Analysis of diagnostic assessment in the science subject for 4th grade elementary school. SEJ (Science Education Journal), 9(1), 23–36. https://doi.org/10.21070/sej.v9i1.1695

Pangga, D., Ratnaya, I. G., Parwata, I. G. L. A., Budhyani, I. D. A. M., & Hamiydah, S. H. (2025). The use of Technology Bloom's taxonomy in formative and summative evaluation: A systematic literature review. Journal of Innovative Technology and Sustainability Education, 1(2), Article 76. https://doi.org/10.63230/jitse.1.2.76

Pastore, S. (2023). Teacher assessment literacy: A systematic review. Frontiers in Education, 8. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2023.1217167

Perkins, M., Furze, L., Roe, J., & Macvaugh, J. (2024). The Artificial Intelligence Assessment Scale (AIAS): A framework for ethical integration of generative AI in educational assessment. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 21(6). https://doi.org/10.53761/q3azde36

Ramalia, A., & Syamsurizal, S. (2025). Tinjauan literatur implementasi asesmen dalam Kurikulum Merdeka. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat dan Riset Pendidikan, 4(1), 2907–2912. https://doi.org/10.31004/jerkin.v4i1.1508

Tang, F., & Zhan, P. (2021). Does diagnostic feedback promote learning? Evidence from a longitudinal cognitive diagnostic assessment. AERA Open, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/23328584211060804

Thorat, S. M. (2025). Beyond exams: Designing competency-based assessments for the 21st century learner. International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, 5(10), 18–27. https://doi.org/10.48175/IJARSCT-25603

Warju. (2016). Educational program evaluation using CIPP model. Innovation of Vocational Technology Education, 12(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v12i1.4502

Downloads

Published

2026-07-01

How to Cite

Ja’far Siddik, Usman Usman, & Nor Fadhilah. (2026). Analisis Komprehensif Teori Evaluasi Pendidikan dalam Pembelajaran. Al-Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan Islam, 4(3), 12–22. https://doi.org/10.59059/al-tarbiyah.v4i3.3056

Similar Articles

<< < 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.